Religious Moderation of Generation Z: Attitude of Students’ Religious Tolerance in Strengthening the Character of the Nation

  • Rusdi Rusli Universitas Lambung Mangkurat Banjarmasin, Kalimantan Selatan
  • Noor Ainah Universitas Lambung Mangkurat Banjarmasin, Kalimantan Selatan
  • Muhammad Ihsanul Arief Universitas Lambung Mangkurat Banjarmasin, Kalimantan Selatan
  • Gusti Muhammad Irhamna Husin Universitas Lambung Mangkurat Banjarmasin, Kalimantan Selatan
Keywords: Religious moderation, Tolerance, Students, Z Generation

Abstract

The complex Indonesian society requires the residents to always maintain good relations to realize a harmonious life with each other. Peaceful and conflict are the potential two poles presenting in human life. Maintaining stable community conditions is a shared responsibility, from the government to the small community level. Besides, the level of the role of academics, especially students, becomes important as an object of research. Religious moderation is a wise attitude toward one's self during the conditions of a multicultural and multireligious society. Researchers focus on how the attitude of religious moderation in the form of tolerance of students representing generation Z, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat Banjarmasin, can be questioned. The students who are the object of their research are studying at FKIP, FK, and FEB. The results of research findings based on a standard of tolerance indicators that correspond to students’ response are more likely to be in an attitude of mutual respect, mutual help among each other, focus on equality, and always tolerance for all communities. In addition, the researchers classified the research findings based on the response of the answers on three categories of students: pluralist, inclusive, and exclusive. Potential attitudes tend to make students enter the pluralist category up to 53%. The type thus shows that students are more receptive to differences by supporting each other's good in the teachings of religions. Next, there are 41% enter the inclusive category. This category tends students to welcome differences in beliefs, but they still hold more of what is within the religions. The last category is exclusive, with 6% of the student classification results. This third catalog fully believes that goodness and truth are only in the person of his religion. Therefore, the three classifications' results show that Lambung Mangkurat University students tend to be more open to each other in the difference of beliefs. It will give positively impact on collaborative affairs in solving specific problems that need to be solved together, especially regarding the issues of this nation.

References

Adhim, T. A. (2015). Evaluasi Program Pelatihan Instalasi Penerangan Di Balai Latihan Kerja Kabupaten Pati. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknik Elektro, 5(3). Diambil dari http://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/elektro/article/view/2216
al-Baantani, M. N. al–Jawi. (2007). Marah Labibli kasyf Ma’na al-Qur’an al-Majid. Beirut: Darubn al-‘Ashshah.
Alfianur, M. J. (2018). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Alquran Di Ma’had al-Jami’ah Putra UIN Antasari Banjarmasin. Diambil dari https://idr.uin-antasari.ac.id/9285/
Ananda, R., & Rafida, T. (2017). Pengantar Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Medan: Perdana publishing.
Arikunto, S. (2011). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Arikunto, S., Jabar, & Cepi, S. (2014). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoritis Praktis Bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Arikunto, S., & Jabar, S. A. (2008). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. .Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Astri Kusumawat, 154030051, & Tb, T. I. (2019). Analisis Tingkat Literasi Keuangan Syariah Pada Pedagang Di Pasar Tradisional Cihapit Kecamatan Bandung Wetan Kota Bandung (Other, Perpustakaan Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Unpas). Perpustakaan Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Unpas. Diambil dari http://repository.unpas.ac.id/43677/
Badu, S. Q. (2012). Implementasi Evaluasi Model Kirkpatrick Pada Perkuliahan Masalah Nilai Awal Dan Syarat Batas. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16(0), 102–129. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v16i0.1108
Dahliana, D., & Irayana, I. (2020). Perubahan Persepsi Pola Asuh Peserta Setelah Mengikuti Program Sekolah Ibu Dan Calon Ibu Kota Banjarmasin. JCE (Journal of Childhood Education), 3(2), 96–110. https://doi.org/10.30736/jce.v3i1.90
Darodjat & Wahyudhiana. (2015). Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Islamadina: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 0(0), 1-23–23. https://doi.org/10.30595/islamadina.v0i0.1665
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional,. (2005). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (3 ed.).
Donald Kirkpatrick & James Kirkpatrick. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. New York: Berrett Koehler Publishers.
FDIK UIN Antasari. (2021). Profil Program Khusus Dai Program Studi Bimbingan dan Penyuluhan Islam (BPI). Banjarmasin.
Firdaus, M. T. (2019, Juni 20). Pola Kaderisasi DAI di Fakultas Dakwah dan Ilmu Komunikasi UIN Antasari Banjarmasin (Studi Terhadap Program Khusus Dai). Diambil 8 Mei 2021, dari https://idr.uin-antasari.ac.id/11981/
Fithry, S. (2018). Evaluasi Program Afirmasi Mahasiswa Asal Wilayah Papua di Universitas Negeri Padang Dengan Menggunakan Model Kirkpatrick. Jurnal Kapita Selekta Geografi, 1(2), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.24036/ksgeo.v1i2.32
Gandomkar, R. (2018). Comparing Kirkpatrick’s original and new model with CIPP evaluation model. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 6(2), 94–95. https://doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2018.41014
GRONLUND, N. E. (1976). Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching Third Edition. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co. Diambil dari https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/002248717202300120
Huda, N. (2016, Juni 24). Evaluasi Efektifitas Program Pendidikan Akhlak Berbasis Prophetic Intelligence Bagi Mahasiswa Iain Antasari Banjarmasin. Diambil 3 Februari 2020, dari https://idr.uin-antasari.ac.id/5142/
Huda, N., & Dahliana, D. (2019). Analisis Gender Pelaksanaan Program Khusus Ulama pada FUH UIN Antasari Banjarmasin. Banjarmasin: Antasari Press.
Huda, N., & Dahliana, D. (2020). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Akhlak Berbasis Ma’had Al-Jami’ah Bagi Mahasiswa Baru UIN Antasari Banjarmasin. Banjarmasin: UIN Antasari.
Kementerian Agama RI. (t.t.). Al-Qur’an. Jakarta. Diambil dari https://quran.kemenag.go.id/
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1998). The Four Levels of Evaluation. Dalam S. M. Brown & C. J. Seidner (Ed.), Evaluating Corporate Training: Models and Issues (hlm. 95–112). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-4850-4_5
Kusjono, G., & Sudjiani, E. (2019). Pengaruh Kualitas Layanan Pendidikan Terhadap Kepuasan Peserta Didik Di SMA Islam Cikal Harapan Bumi Serpong Damai. Jurnal Ilmiah Feasible (JIF), 1(1), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.32493/fb.v1i1.2019.83-94.2269
Muhammad, Darodjat, & Wahyudhiana. (t.t.). Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Islamdina, XIV(1), 2015.
Muhammad, F. (2019). Diseminasi Dakwah Era Disrupsi 4.0 Dan Literasi Media Sosial (Perspektif Jurnalisme Profetik). Jurnal Jurnalisa : Jurnal Jurusan Jurnalistik, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.24252/jurnalisa.v5i2.11454
Muhammad Natsir. (2000). Fiqhud Dakwah. Jakarta: Media Dakwah.
Muryadi, A. D. (2017). Model Evaluasi Program Dalam Penelitian Evaluasi. Jurnal Ilmiah PENJAS (Penelitian, Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran), 3(1). Diambil dari http://ejournal.utp.ac.id/index.php/JIP/article/view/538
Musaba, Z. (2015). Bunga Rampai Muhammadiyah. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo.
Nawawi, N. (2009). Kompetensi Juru Dakwah. KOMUNIKA: Jurnal Dakwah dan Komunikasi, 3(2), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.24090/komunika.v3i2.131
Nurhayati, Y. (2018). Penerapan Model Kirkpatrick untuk Evaluasi Program Diklat Teknis Subtantif Materi Perencanaan Pembelajaran Di Wilayah Kerja Provinsi Kepulauan Riau. Andragogi: Jurnal Diklat Teknis Pendidikan Dan Keagamaan, 6(2), 170–187. https://doi.org/10.36052/andragogi.v6i2.63
Prasetya, T. A., & Harjanto, C. T. (2020). Pengaruh Mutu Pembelajaran Online Dan Tingkat Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Hasil Belajar Saat Pandemi COVID19. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 17(2), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.23887/jptk-undiksha.v17i2.25286
Purwanto, M. N. (2010). Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi. Bandung: Remaja Pengajaran Rosdakarya.
Rahmawati, R. F. (2016). Kaderisasi dakwah melalui lembaga pendidikan islam. TADBIR : Jurnal Manajemen Dakwah, 1(1). Diambil dari https://journal.iainkudus.ac.id/index.php/tadbir/article/view/2387
Ridho, A., Kusaeri, K., Nasaruddin, N., & Rohman, F. (2020). Evaluasi Program Gerakan Furudhul Ainiyah (Gefa) dengan Menggunakan Model Kirkpatrick. FIKROTUNA, 11(01). https://doi.org/10.32806/jf.v11i01.3938
Ritonga, R., Saepudin, A., & Wahyudin, U. (2019). Penerapan Model Evaluasi Kirkpatrick Empat Level Dalam Mengevaluasi Program Diklat Di Balai Besar Pelatihan Pertania (BBPP) Lembang. Jurnal Pendidikan Nonformal, 14(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.17977/um041v14i1p12-21
Samsuddin, S., Iskandar, I., & Nurshamsul, M. (2020). Pendidikan kader da’i ormas Wahdah Islamiyah melalui halaqah tarbiyah. Ta’dibuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(2), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.32832/tadibuna.v9i2.3527
Siswadi, Y. (2014). Analisis Faktor Internal, Faktor Eksternal Dan Pembelajaran Kewirausahaan Yang Mempengaruhi Minat Mahasiswa Dalam Berwirausaha. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 13(1). Diambil dari http://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/mbisnis/article/view/108
Sudijono,A. (2011). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Sukardi, M. (2011). Evaluasi Pendidikan; Prinsip dan Operasionalnya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Sukayat, T. (2009). Quantum Dakwah. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Suparta, M. (2003). Metode Dakwah. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Tayibnapis, F. Y. (2019). Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi Untuk Program Pendidikan dan Penelitian. Diambil dari http://r2kn.litbang.kemkes.go.id:8080/handle/123456789/61997
UIN Antasari. (2021). Fakultas Dakwah dan Ilmu Komunikasi UIN Antasari Banjarmasin. Diambil 29 Juli 2021, dari https://fdk.uin-antasari.ac.id/
Widiyanto, J. (2018). Evaluasi Pembelajaran (Sesuai dengan Kurikulum 2013): Konsep Prinsip dan Prosedur. Madiun: UNIPMA PRESS.
Widodo, A. (2019). Dakwah di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Khabar: Komunikasi Dan Penyiaran Islam, 1(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.37092/khabar.v1i1.120
Yunus, R., Diana, N., Patimah, S., & Pahrudin, A. (2020). Kirkpatrick Model Evaluation On The Implementation Of Strengthening School Supervisors Based On Best Practice, Hots And Adult Learning. Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 9(02), 651–662. https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v9i02.1286
Yusuf, F. (2008). Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi untuk Program Pendidikan dan Penelitian. Jakarta: PT.Rineka Cipta.
Zainol, Z., Hashim, A., & Kasim, A. (2017). Application of Kirkpatrick Model for Effectiveness of Islamic Education Teacher Programme. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2017, 2222–6990. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i11/3468
Published
2022-11-05
How to Cite
Rusli, R., Ainah, N., Arief, M., & Husin, G. (2022). Religious Moderation of Generation Z: Attitude of Students’ Religious Tolerance in Strengthening the Character of the Nation. El Buhuth: Borneo Journal of Islamic Studies, 5(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.21093/el-buhuth.v5i01.4934