Implikasi Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 tentang Penyesuaian Batasan Tindak Pidana Ringan dan Jumlah Denda dalam KUHP di Indonesia: Suatu Kajian Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Jerman dan Belanda

Nabila Aulia

doi:10.21093/samilrev.v2i1.12400

Nabila Aulia Universitas Mulawarman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21093/samilrev.v2i1.12400

Keywords: PERMA, Misdemeanor Crime, Legal Comparison, Germany, Netherlands

Abstract

This study analyzes the implications of Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 2 of 2012 on the criminal justice system in Indonesia, focusing on the effectiveness of handling misdemeanor offenses (Tipiring). Through a comparative study of the legal system with Germany (Bagatellkriminalität) and the Netherlands (Wet Mulder), this study explores how continental countries manage minor offenses for the sake of judicial efficiency. The results of the study show that PERMA No. 2 of 2012 succeeded in restoring the economic value in the Criminal Code through the adjustment of the threshold of Rp2,500,000.00, which sociologically reduces the stigmatization of small actors. However, when compared to Germany and the Netherlands which have implemented systematic deprocessalization mechanisms and administrative fines, Indonesia still faces synchronization obstacles at the investigation and prosecution levels. This study concludes that strengthening restorative justice and simplifying procedures as applied in Western Europe is very urgent to be integrated more deeply to overcome the burden of cases and overcrowding in Indonesian correctional institutions.

References

Al Alawi, Moh Nauval Karim. “Implementasi Teori Law as a Tools of Social Engineering Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Instrumen Kontrol Sosial dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice 2, no. 2 (2024). https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v2i2.3393.
Ambarwati, Tri, Fitri Nadiah Rahima, and Yoga Muhammad Rezki. SEJARAH PERKEMBANGAN HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA. n.d.
Fatoni, Syamsul, Erma Rusdiana, Imron Rosyadi, and Opik Rozikin. “Asas Proporsionalitas: Perspektif Hukum Positif dan Maqosid Syariah dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana.” Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM 32, no. 1 (2025): 46–71. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol32.iss1.art3.
Kamilatun, and Nisa Fadhilah. “IMPLEMENTASI PERMA NOMOR 02 TAHUN 2012 TENTANG PENYESUAIAN BATASAN TINDAK PIDANA RINGAN DAN JUMLAH DENDA DALAM KUHP TERHADAP PELAKU PENCURIAN RINGAN.” Jurnal Hukum Legalita 4, no. 1 (2022): 104–14. https://doi.org/10.47637/legalita.v4i1.553.
Karina, Gladys Donna, and Fazari Zul Hasmi Kanggas. “Analisa Teori Keadilan John Rawls Dan Teori Utilitarianisme Jeremy Benthan Terhadap Konsep Pemenuhan Hak Korban Menurut Perspektif Viktimologi.” SYARI’AH Journal of Indonesian Comparative of Syari’ah Law, 2023.
Lukito, Ratno. “‘Compare But Not to Compare’: Kajian Perbandingan Hukum di Indonesia.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 5, no. 2 (2022): 257–91. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.5.2.257-291.
Mubarok, Nafi’. “Sejarah Perkembangan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia: Menyongsong Kehadiran KUHP 2023 dengan Memahami dari Aspek Kesejarahan.” Al-Qānūn: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam 27, no. 1 (2024).
Mulyana Hadi, Adwi, Anik Iftitah, and Syahrul Alamsyah. “Restorative Justice Through Strengthening Community Legal Culture in Indonesia: Challenges and Opportunity.” Mulawarman Law Review, July 31, 2023, 32–44. https://doi.org/10.30872/mulrev.v8i1.1140.
Pramono, Deni, Slamet Rohadi, Galuh Adi Wijaya, and Andreas Zulkarnain. “Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Ringan Melalui Upaya Nonpenal.” Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum 12, no. 1 (2023): 68. https://doi.org/10.22373/legitimasi.v12i1.17966.
Pramono, Faisal Hadi, and Laras Astuti. “Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif Pada Tindak Pidana Ringan di Kejaksaan Negeri Yogyakarta.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (IJCLC) 4, no. 2 (2023): 84–98. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v4i2.19806.
Prasetya, Djaelani. “Relevansi Nilai Barang Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian.” Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 12, no. 2 (2020).
Prasetya, Regita Cahyani, and Hasna Afifah. “Implementasi Teori Retributif Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Mati Kasus Mutilasi Wanita di Malang.” Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum 3, no. 6 (2025).
Pratiwi, Endang, Theo Negoro, and Hassanain Haykal. “Teori Utilitarianisme Jeremy Bentham: Tujuan Hukum Atau Metode Pengujian Produk Hukum?” Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 2 (2022): 268. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1922.
Susanna, Eva, and Yusnaidi Kamaruzzaman. “PENYELESAIAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA RINGAN PADA TINGKAT GAMPONG MELALUI PENERAPAN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE.” Journal of Law and Government Scienc 10, no. 1 (2024).
Yusuf, Hambali. “LAW ENFORCEMENT OF MINOR CRIMES (TIPIRING) WITH A RESTORATIVE JUSTICE APPROACH REJECTED BY THE VICTIM AT THE LAHAT RESORT POLICE.” Rewang Rencang : Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis 5, no. 7 (2024).