Legal Standing Bank Indonesia Sebagai Pemohon Pailit

  • Fanny Adiva Nuari Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani Yogyakarta
  • Mochamad Cholil Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani Yogyakarta
  • Rizma Kurniawati Universitas Jenderal Achmad Yani Yogyakarta
Keywords: Bank Indonesia, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Creditor, Commercial Court

Abstract

Bank Indonesia's authority as a bankruptcy petitioner is regulated in Article 2 paragraph (3) of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, which states that only Bank Indonesia has the right to file for bankruptcy against debtors that have the status of a bank. Although it does not act as a direct creditor, this role is carried out in order to protect the public interest and the stability of the financial system and the national economy, with a valid and strong legal basis. This authority is administrative in nature, but reflects a broad responsibility to maintain confidence in the banking system. Although it has been criticized for limiting the rights of other creditors, the existence of this regulation demonstrates the need for evaluation and potential legal reform to create a balance between protecting the public interest and fairness for creditors. This study uses normative research with several approaches, namely the legislative approach and the conceptual approach. The results of this study indicate that Bank Indonesia can use its authority as a bankruptcy petitioner if the specified terms and conditions can be fulfilled.

References

Bank Indonesia. (2023). Stabilitas Sistem Keuangan Indonesia: Kajian Stabilitas Keuangan. Jakarta: Bank Indonesia.

CMS Law Tax. (2020). Act on the confirmation of private restructuring plans (WHOA) (p. 6). https://cms.law
Fakhrudin Mahalizikri, I. (2015). Aspek masalah kepailitan dalam tataran teori dan problematikanya yang berlaku di Indonesia. IQTISHADUNA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Kita, 4(1), 25–39.

Fakhrudin Mahalizikri, Irawan. Aspek Masalah Kepailitan Dalam Tataran Teori Dan Problematikanya Yang Berlaku Di Indonesia. IQTISHADUNA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi.

Fauzi, M. (2009). Kedudukan Bank Indonesia dalam kepailitan bank. Risalah Hukum e-Journal FH Unmul, 5(1).
Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan. (2020). Peran LPS dalam Menangani Bank Gagal. Jakarta: LPS Press.

Meijer, F., & Holtzer, M. (2021). The Dutch Scheme: The WHOA in Practice. Deventer: Wolters Kluwer.

Miftah, M., & Anggraini, L. N. (2025). Perlindungan hukum atas hak-hak nasabah terhadap bank yang dinyatakan pailit. Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 13(2), 123–131.

OCBC NISP. (2022, November 15). Kredit macet: Penyebab, dampak, dan cara mengatasinya. https://www.ocbcnisp.com

Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 2023 tentang Pengembangan dan Penguatan Sektor Keuangan. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2023 Nomor 9, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 6846.

Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 1999 tentang Bank Indonesia. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1999 Nomor 66, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3845.

Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 131, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 4443.

Van Zwieten, Kristin, Gurrea-Martínez, Aurelio, Paterson, Sarah, & Vermeulen, Reinier. (2023). Restructuring Across Borders: The Dutch WHOA and Lessons from the Chapter 11 Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Published
2025-09-25
How to Cite
Nuari, F., Cholil, M., & Kurniawati, R. (2025). Legal Standing Bank Indonesia Sebagai Pemohon Pailit. SAMI Law Review, 1(2), 153-174. https://doi.org/10.21093/samilrev.v1i2.10482

Most read articles by the same author(s)