Mengembangkan Model Pengukuran dan Struktural untuk Menilai Interrelasi Pengetahuan dengan Akhlak Siswa

  • Zurqoni Zurqoni State Islamic Institute of Samarinda
Keywords: Asesmen, Akhlak Mulia, Pengetahuan

Abstract

Moral in the context of school education management is essential, and execution of education of moral cannot be separated from the quality of learning and teaching, and assessment system. The application of assessment of moral knowledge and moral behavior in Madrasah Aliyah (MA) is still conventional and partial. The purpose of this research is: (a) to develop an assessment model of moral applied to assess students’ moral in Madrasah Aliyah; and (b) to find out the influence of students’ knowledge of moral on their own moral. This research produces a measurement model in the form of an internal structure consisting of dimensions of moral measurement, and a structural model relating moral with the knowledge of moral.

This research applies research and development model. The subjects are students  of MAs. Data analysis utilizing Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). CFA applied to analyze conformity of measurement model, while SEM applied to analyze conformity of structural model using software LISREL 851. Conformity of measurement and structural model based on the criteria of r-value >0.05, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) < 0.08, and Goodness of Fit Index  (GFI)  > 0.90.

The result of this development research can be concluded as follows. The internal structure of assessment model of learning and teaching including willingness, conscience, value, attitude and moral behavior dimensions is considered as a good assessment model to assess students’ moral in Madrasah Aliyah. It is based on the result of  CFA, namely low factor loading value 0.39 (λ > 0.30), r-value = 0.0804 > 0.05; RMSEA = 0.074 < 0.08; and GFI= 0.98 > 0.90. The structural model relating moral and knowledge is regarded as a good model based on r-value = 0.08207 > 0.05; RMSEA= 0.005 < 0.08; and GFI = 0.97 > 0.90. The influence of  students’ knowledge of moral  on  their own moral (γ1=0,61) are significant.

Author Biography

Zurqoni Zurqoni, State Islamic Institute of Samarinda
Research Methodology and Education Evaluation

References

Achmad Mubarak, Jiwa dalam al-Qur’a, Jakarta: Paramadina, 2000
Aep Saefudin, Akhlak dalam perspektif wacana pemikir muslim, Ta’dib, 2002, 2, 1.
Ahmad Amin, Kitab al-akhlaq, Beirut-Lubnan: Dar al-Kitab al-‘Araby, 1974
Al-Ahwani, A.F., Al-tarbiyyah fi-al-Islam. Cairo: Darul Ma’arif, t.th.
Al-Baqi, M.F.A., Al-Mu’jam al-mufaras li alfaz al-Qur’an. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1992.
Al-Ghazali, Ihya’ ulum al-din. Jilid III. Damaskus: Dar Al-Fikr, t.th.
-----------, Khuluq al-muslim. Kuwait: Darul Bayan, t.th.
Alken, L.R, Psychological testing and assessment, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1977
Allen, M.J. & Yen, W.M. , Introduction to measurement theory, Colifornia: Broks/Cole Publishing Company, 1979
Al-Qasimi, M.J., Mau’izatul mu’minin, II,. Cairo: Dar al-’Usur li al-Taba’ wa al-Nasyr, 1969
Anderson, L.W., Assessing affective characteristic in the schools, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1981
-----------, Assessing affective characteristic in the schools, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1981
Asmaran As., Pengantar studi akhlak. Jakarta: Rajawali, 2002
Azwar, S., Sikap manusia: Teori dan pengukurannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2005
-----------, Reliabilitas dan validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Relajar, 2007
Baharuddin dan Eka Nur Wahyuni, Teori belajar dan pembelajaran, Yogyakarta: Arruz Media, 2008.
Bahrul Hayat, Manual item and test analysis (ITEMAN). Jakarta: Puslitbangsisjian Balitbang Dikbud, 1997
Barmawi Umary, Materi akhlak, Solo: Ramadhani, 1993
Bednar, A. & Levie, W.H. , Attitude-change principles. Dalam M. Fleming & W.H. Levie (Eds.), Instructional message design: Principles from the behavioral and cognitive sciences. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, 1993
Bird, C., Social psychology. New York: Appleton Century Co., 1967
Black, P. dan Wiliam, D. , Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappa, 1998, 80, 2, 139-148.
Borg, W. R. & Gall. M. D,. Educational research (4th ed.). New York: Longman, 1983
Cennamo, K. & Kalk, D., Real world instructional design, Canada: Thomson Learning, Inc., 2005
Crocker, L. & Algina, J. , Introduction to classical and modern test theory, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winsten, 1986
Darraz, M.A., Dustur al-akhlaq fi al-Qur’an. Beirut: Muassasah al-Risalah, 1973
Derryberry, W.P. & Thoma, S. J. , Moral judgment, self understanding, and moral action: the role of multiple constructs. ProQuest education journals, 2005, 52, 1.
Djemari Mardapi, Pengukuran, penilaian dan evaluasi. Kumpulan makalah seminar dan lokakarya. Yogyakarta: PPs. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 2002
-----------, Pengembangan instrumen penelitian pendidikan. Yogyakarta: PPs. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, 2005
Fazio, L.S., The delphi: Education and assessment in institutional goal setting: Dalam David S. Cordray & Mark W. Lipsey (Eds). Evaluation studies: Review annual, Colifornia: Sage Publications, Inc., 1987,11.
Fernandes, H.J.X. Testing and measurement. Jakarta: National Education Planning, Evaluating and Curriculum Development, 1984.
Gerungan, WA., Psikologi sosial. Bandung : Refika Aditama, 2000.
Getzels, J.W., The problem of interest: A reconsideration. Dalam H.A. Robinson (ed.). Reading: Seventy-five years of progress. Supplementary Education Monographs, 1966.
Hambelton, R.K., Swaminathan, H. & Roger, H.J., Fundamental of item response theory, Newbury Park: Sage Publication, 1991.
Hampshire, S., Freedom of individual. New York: Harper, 1966.
Hendrix, W. H., et al., Multimethod approach for measuring changes in character. Journal of research in character education, 2004, 2, 1.
Ibrahim Anis, Al-Mu’jam al-wasit. Mesir: Darul Ma’arif, 1972.
Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T., Meaningful assessment: A managable and cooperative process. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2002.
Jones, E.E. & Davis, K.E., From act to disposition: The atribution process in person perception. Dalam Berkowith, L. (ed.). Advence in experimental social psychology, New York: Academic Press, 1965, 2, 219-266. http:// home. comcast. net/ icek. aizen/ book/ chz.pdf.
Jőreskog, K.G. & Sőrbom, D., Lisrel 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1996.
Kniker, C.R., You and value education. Ohio: Charless E. Merrill Publishing Company, 1977
Kohlberg, L., The cognitive-developmental approach to moral education. New Jersey: Printice Hall, Inc., 1977
Koplan, R.M. & Saccuzzo, D.P., Psychological testing: Principles, aplication and issue. Monterey: Broks/Cole Publishing Company, 1982
Kumaidi, Interpretasi koefisien korelasi skor-butir dengan skor total uji kebermaknaan koefisien reliabilitas KR-20 dalam penelitian pendidikan dan psikologi. Jurnal ilmu pendidikan, II, 2, 2004, 107-113.
Lai, K. R., & Lan, C. H., Modeling peer assessment as agent negotiation in a computer supported collaborative learning environment. Educational technology & society, 9, 3, 2006.
Lickona, T., Education for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. New York: Bantam Books, 1991
Lickona, T. (Ed.). Moral development and behavior: Theory, research, and social issue. New York: Holt. Rinehart and Winston.
Mehren, W.A. & Irvin, J.L., Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology. Fort Worth: Hartcourt Brace College Publisher, 1991
Mulyana, R., Mengartikulasikan pendidikan nilai. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2004
Naga, D.S., Pengantar teori skor pada pengukuran pendidikan. Jakarta: Gunadarma, 2002
Naga, D.S., Ketidaktepatan penggunaan validitas butir dan koefisien reliabilitas dalam penelitian pendidikan dan psikologi, Jurnal ilmu pendidikan, II, 2, 2004, 99-106.
Nitko, A. J. dan Brookhrat, S. M., Educational assessment of students, 6th ed. New Jersey: Person Educational Inc., 2007
Noonan, B. & Duncan, C. R., Peer and self-Assessment in high schools, practical assessment, research & evaluation. A peer-reviewed electronic journal, 2005
Nunally, J.C., Introduction to psychological measurement. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc., 1970
-----------, Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc., 1981
Pedhazur, E.J., Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt Rinehart and Wiston, Inc., 1982
Peter, Ji et al., A measurement model of student character as described by the Positive Action Program. Journal of research in character education, 3, 2005
Plomp,T., Design methodology and developmental research in education and training, Enschende-Netherland: Faculty of Educational Science and Technology (FEST), University of Twente, 1982.
Rokeach, M., The nature of human values. New York: Free Press, 1971
Rudd, A. & Stoll, S., Measuring students' character in secondary education: The development of the principled thinking inventory. Journal of research in character education, 2, 2004
Siti Muri’ah, “Penilaian Akhlak Mulia: Mengembangkan Model Alternatif Penilaian Akhlak Mulia dalam Pembelajaran”, dalam Jurnal Ulumuna, IAIN Mataram, 2012Skinner, B.F. About behaviorism. New York: Vintage Books, 1976
Solimun, Structural equation modelling (SEM), lisrel dan amos. Malang: FMIPA UNIBRAW, 2002.
Tessmer, M., Planning and conducting formative evaluation. London: Kogan Page Ltd. 1993. http:// www. geocities. com/ zulkardi/ books.html.
Viswanathan, M., Measurement errorr and research design. London: Sage Publication, 2005
Weeden, P., Winter, J. & Broadfoot, P., Assessment: What’s in it for school, New York: Routledge Falmer, 2002
Witkin, B.R., Assessing need in educational and sosial programs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publisher, 1984
Zurqoni, Menakar Akhlak Siswa, Yogyakarta, Arruzz Media, 2012
Published
2017-06-01
How to Cite
Zurqoni, Z. (2017). Mengembangkan Model Pengukuran dan Struktural untuk Menilai Interrelasi Pengetahuan dengan Akhlak Siswa. FENOMENA, 9(1), 47 - 66. https://doi.org/10.21093/fj.v9i1.720