Already have a Username/Password for Kalimantan International Journal?
Need a Username/Password?
Registration and login are required to submit items online and to check the status of current submissions.
Submission Preparation ChecklistAs part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.
The submission has not been previously published, nor is it before another journal for consideration (or an explanation has been provided in Comments to the Editor).
The submission file is in OpenOffice, Microsoft Word, or RTF document file format.
Where available, URLs for the references have been provided.
The text is single-spaced; uses a 12-point font, rather than underlining (except with URL addresses); and all illustrations, figures, and tables are placed within the text at the appropriate points, rather than at the end.
The text adheres to the stylistic and bibliographic requirements outlined in the Author Guidelines.
The following writing and referencing rules are to be taken into consideration.
Click here for Manuscript Template DOWNLOAD
The articles need to be not published elsewhere previously. If the article has been presented at any seminar or conference, the name of the conference, the institution where it has been presented and the date of the presentation needs to be mentioned. The Journal is written in English.
The title of the article must be written in capital letters, using font size 14 and bold. One line space must be left after the title. The name and surname of the author(s), and the institution.
The number of pages of the article must 10-15, not exceed 20, including abstract, reference, and author profile list. The whole work must be written in Garamond, font size 12. Subheading must be in bold, and the first letter of each word must be capital letters.
All the text must be written using single line spacing, including the reference list. The research article should normally consist of the following parts: introduction, research method , findings, discussion, and conclusion.
Writing the title of the article using the font "Garamond" 14 pt, below it is written the author's name with a font size of 10 pt and affiliation, city, country with a font size of 10 pt
The abstract must be brief, informative and self-explanatory and should be written in the past tense. It must not exceed 150-250 words in length and should concisely summarize all-important results of the paper without excessive methodical and experimental details. Standard nomenclature should be used and abbreviations should be avoided.
Beside abstract, about 3 to 5 keywords characterizing the paper should be listed.
The introduction should give a concise background and provide a rationale for the presented study. It should provide a clear statement of the problem and should be understandable to colleagues from a broad range of scientific disciplines.
This should give detailed and sufficient information about the materials and procedures used to allow experiments to be reproduced. Previously published procedures and sources of laboratory procedures should be cited. Information on the equipment model, manufacturer’s name and address including the city, province/state and country should be provided. The procedures should be written in the past tense and should consist of paragraphs with individual methods
This should describe the design of the experiment and the obtained results. All tables, figures, graphs, statistical analyses, and sample calculations should be presented in this section.
In tables font size 10 must be used and vertical lines must be not be drawn. When the contents of the table cannot fit into the table, font size 10 might be used. The number of the table and the title must be written above the table.
The discussion should relate the presented results to those of previous own or other studies, interprets them and draw conclusions. It can outline working hypotheses, theories, and applications.
Writing a conclusion is the final part of the research paper, drawing everything together and tying it into initial research. Writing a conclusion involves summing up the paper and giving a very brief description of the results, although you should not go into too much detail about this.
Acknowledgments of people, grants, funds, etc should be placed in a separate section not numbered at the very end of the paper.
The items on the reference list must be arranged according to APA Referencing. (Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association).
Use the name of the author(s) followed by the year of publication when citing references within the text and page number. For example:
1 author (Nur, 2020)
2 authors (Eggen & Kauchak, 2001)
3 or more authors (Jatmiko et al., 2018)
How to Create a Reference List
Amer, A. (2006). Reflections on Bloom’s revised taxonomy. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 4(8), 213-230.
Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, the classification of educational goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York, NY: David McKay Company.
Callan, R.J. (1998). Circadian rhythm and the business person. International Journal of Value-Based Management, 11, 9-17.
Forehand, M. (2005). Bloom’s taxonomy: Orginal and revised. In Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching, and Technology. Retrieved 29 March 2010 from http://eit.tamu.edu/JJ/DE/BloomsTaxonomy.pdf
Biggs, J. B. & Collis, K. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: the SOLO taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.
Eggen, P. & Kauchak, D. (2001). Educational psychology: Windows on classrooms. New Jersey: Merrill.
Erden, M., & Akman, Y. (1996). Egitim psikolojisi[Educational psychology]. Ankara: Arkadas Yayınevi.
Minogue, J. & Jones, G. (2009). Measuring the impact of haptic feedback using the SOLO taxonomy. International Journal of Science Education, 31(10), 1359–1378.
O’Neill, G., & Murphy, F. (2010). Guide to taxonomies of learning. UCD Teaching and Learning/Resources, Retrieved 01 November 2010 from http://www.ucd.ie/t4cms/ucdtla0034.pdf
3 or more authors:
Jatmiko, B., Prahani, B.K., Munasir, Supardi, Z.A.I., Wicaksono, I., Erlina, N., Pandiangan, P., Althaf, R., & Zainuddin. (2018). The comparison of OR-IPA teaching model and problem based learning model effectiveness to improve critical thinking skills of pre-service physics teachers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(2), 1-22.
The copyright of the received article once accepted for publication shall be assigned to the journal as the publisher of the journal. The intended copyright includes the right to publish the article in various forms (including reprints). The journal maintains the publishing rights to the published articles.
This work is licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)
The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.
This journal charges the following author fees.