Students’ Literacy and Articles’ Quality Improvement in the Faculty of Da’wa and Communication in Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University

  • Siti Syamsiyatun Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
  • Ahmad Izudin Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Abstract

The aim of this article is to investigate student interest in accessing online platform of academic journals in the Faculty of Da’wah and Communication, UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta. This research applied survey method with quantitative technique to analyse collected data. The results show that all variables tested by conclusions are accepted. This means, after processing the data from the results of questionnaires, it can be seen that the data tested with simple linear regression methods have a positive value so it shows that students’ interest in accessing online journal has an effect on improving quality of their articles. Meanwhile, student interest in accessing online journal survey was still minimal, with 42.2% answered that they do not know the existence of the academic journals. However, 98% of students answered that the internet is a primary need. Unfortunately, the internet, as a tool to access online journals, is mostly used to find entertainment contents with a percentage of 56%. This value is obtained from the average access to the internet; 38% in between 1-3 hours, 30.4% in between 4-6 hours, 22.8% in between 7-10 hours, 4.8% in between 11-13%, ad 4% in > 14 hours.

Keywords: Online academic journals, student interest, and survey.

References

Al-Imarah, A. A., Shields, R., & Kamm, R. (2021). Is quality assurance compatible with technological innovation? Case studies of massive open online courses (MOOCs) in United Kingdom higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 27(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2021.1830474
Arikunto, S. (1998). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Rineka Cipta.
Aryani, S. A., Sunarsih, S., & Abadi, K. R. (2018). Scientific Paradigm Towards World-Class University: Comparative Study on UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta and UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang. ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 18(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.14421/esensia.v18i1.1467
Bashir, S., Mahmood, K., & Shafique, F. (2008). Internet use among university students: A survey in university of the punjab, Lahore. Pakistan Journal of Library and Information Science, 9(1), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.47657/20089811
Bungin, B. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian Sosial. Airlangga University Press.
Coates, H. (2005). The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education, 11(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538320500074915
Creswell, J. W. (2010). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif Kuantitatif dan Mixed. Pustaka Pelajar.
Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariete dengan Program IBM SPSS 23. Universitas Diponegoro Press.
Hasiguan, J. (2008). Pemanfaatan Internet: Studi kasus tentang Pola, Manfaat dan Tujuan Penggunaan Internet oleh Mahasiswa pada Perpustakaan USU. Pustaha: Jurnal Studi Perpustakaan Dan Informasi, 1(2), 1–18.
Indrawati, N. (2009). Motivasi dan Minat Mahasiswa untuk Mengikuti Pendidikan Profesi Akuntansi. Pekbis Jurnal, 1(2), 124–130.
Mahajan, R., Agrawal, R., Sharma, V., & Nangia, V. (2014). Factors affecting quality of management education in India: An interpretive structural modelling approach. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(4), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2012-0115
Mayling Oey-Gardiner. (2017). Perubahan dalam Pendidikan Tinggi Indonesia. In D. Dhakidae (Ed.), Era Disrupsi Peluang dan Tantangan Pendidikan Tinggi Indonesia. Akademi Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (AIPI).
Morissan. (2012). Metode Penelitian Survei. Kencana.
Muhson, A. (2009). Peningkatan Minat Belajar dan Pemahaman Mahasiswa Melalui Penerapan Problem-Based Learning. Jurnal Kependidikan, 39(2), 171–182.
Mulyasa. (2002). Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah. Rosdakarya.
Previtali, P., & Cerchiello, P. (2021). Corporate governance and the responsiveness of organisations to a change in accreditation standards. Quality in Higher Education, 27(1), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2020.1833417
Rahardjo, D., Sumardjo, Lubis, D. P., & Harijati, S. (2015). Model Akses dan Pemanfaatan Internet dalam Peningkatan Kemandirian Belajar Mahasiswa Pendidikan Tinggi Terbuka dan Jarak Jauh. Institute Pertanian Bogor.
Ratnasari, A. (2008). Internet Sebagai Media Penunjang Studi Mahasiswa. Mimbar, 24(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v24i1.250
Rofiq, A. C. (2009). Pembelajaran PIBP dan Signifikansinya dalam Peningkatan Mutu Akademik Mahasiswa. Pustakaloka, 1(1), 51–65.
Sayidah, N., Ady, S. U., Supriyati, J., Sutarmin, Winedar, M., Mulyaningtyas, A., & Assagaf, A. (2019). Quality and university governance in Indonesia. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(4), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n4p10
Singarimbun, M., & Effendi, S. (1987). Metode penelitian Survey. Prenada.
Stephen Gorard. (2003). Quantitative Methods in Social Science.
Sudadio. (2012). Peningkatan Mutu Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah di Provinsi Banten Melalui Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16(2), 340–360.
Sugiono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Alpabeta.
Trihendradi. (2012). Step by Step SPSS 20 Analisis Data Statistik. Andi Offset.
Williams, J. (2016). Quality assurance and quality enhancement: Is there a relationship? Quality in Higher Education, 22(2), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2016.1227207
Published
2021-06-24
Section
Articles