Mengoptimalkan Pembelajaran yang Didukung AI Melalui Self-Determination Theory: Mengintegrasikan Psychological Needs dan Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan Islam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21093/a517tz85Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Self-Determination Theory, Psychological Needs, Pendidikan IslamAbstract
The rapid development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has transformed educational practices by providing more personalized, adaptive, and efficient learning experiences. However, the use of AI does not automatically improve learning achievement because it has the potential to cause dependence on technology, cognitive offloading, the illusion of competence, and reduced social interaction among students. Previous research generally examines these issues from the perspective of educational technology or educational psychology, while integration with Islamic education values is still limited. This study aims to analyze the optimization of AI-based learning achievement through the integration of Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and Islamic Education. This study uses a qualitative approach with a literature study method. Data were collected from books and scientific journal articles, then analyzed descriptively through conceptual synthesis with SDT as the main theoretical foundation. The results of the study indicate that AI can support learning achievement by fulfilling students' psychological needs, namely autonomy, competence, and relatedness, supported by self-regulated learning, metacognition, cognitive load, and self-efficacy. Islamic education enriches these three dimensions through the values of tarbiyah (Islamic education), ta'lim (Islamic study), ta'dib (Islamic guidance), itqan (Islamic guidance), and ta'awun (Islamic covenant). Therefore, the use of AI not only encourages academic achievement but also character development, moral responsibility, and spiritual awareness. Therefore, optimizing AI-based learning achievement requires integrating psychological and Islamic educational perspectives so that AI can function as a pedagogical instrument that supports holistic learning.
References
Alhafiz Hertri Anggara, Hanif Fajrul Hayatullah, Muhammad Syadaffa, & Firas Afif. (2025). Pendidikan Iman dan Islam yang Kuat Serta Pengaruhnya dalam Membentuk Kepribadian. Reflection : Islamic Education Journal, 2(2), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.61132/reflection.v2i2.645
Al-Hoorie, A. H., Hiver, P., Liu, M., & Alshlowiy, A. (2026). GenAI and language learning motivation: Fundamental questions and a research agenda. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190526100282
Al-Zahrani, A. M. (2025). Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots on Human Connection and Emotional Support Among Higher Education Students. Sage Open, 15(2), 21582440251340615. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251340615
Anderias Henukh, Asep Irvan Irvani, Tutik Yuliatun, Shinta Purnamasari, Siti Nurdianti Muhajir, Amar Amrullah, & John Yoro Parlindungan. (2025). Transformasi Pembelajaran di Era Artifical Intelligence. PT. Sigufi Artha Nusantara.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, Personality, and Development Within Embedded Social Contexts: An Overview of Self-Determination Theory. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation (1st ed., pp. 85–108). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0006
Fajar Syarif. (2023). TARBIYAH, TA’L?M AND TA’D?B: THE CONTESTATION OF DEFINITIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR ISLAMIC EDUCATION. 654–668.
Firas Septyningrum, Achmad Hufad, & Pandu Hyangsewu. (2025). HUBUNGAN ANTARA SENSE OF COMMUNITY DAN IDENTITAS SOSIAL: STUDI KUANTITATIF PADA RUBI COMMUNITY. Psycho Idea, 23(1).
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906
Halstead, M. (2004). An Islamic concept of education. Comparative Education, 40(4), 517–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305006042000284510
Hellen Tiara & Danu. (2023). Epistemology of Islamic Education: Criticism and Alternative Solutions. HEUTAGOGIA: Journal of Islamic Education, 3(1), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.14421/hjie.2023.31-09
Heung, Y. M. E., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2025). How ChatGPT impacts student engagement from a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100361
Howcroft, A., & Blake, H. (2025). Empathy by Design: Reframing the Empathy Gap Between AI and Humans in Mental Health Chatbots. Information, 16(12), 1074. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16121074
Khoiruddin, M. A., & Dzulkifli, I. (2026). INTEGRATING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN ISLAMIC EDUCATION: ETHICAL, PEDAGOGICAL, AND SUSTAINABILITY PERSPECTIVES. INTIHA: Islamic Education Journal, 3(2), 490–499. https://doi.org/10.58988/intiha.v3i2.458
King, R. B. (2015). Sense of relatedness boosts engagement, achievement, and well-being: A latent growth model study. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.04.002
Li, Y., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2025). The mediating effects of needs satisfaction on the relationship between teacher support and student engagement with generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) chatbots from a self-determination theory (SDT) perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 30(14), 20051–20070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13574-w
Matueny, Dr. R. M., & Nyamai, Dr. J. J. (2025). Illusion of Competence and Skill Degradation in Artificial Intelligence Dependency among Users. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, XII(V), 1725–1738. https://doi.org/10.51244/IJRSI.2025.120500163
Müller, F. H., & Louw, J. (2004). Learning Environment, Motivation and Interest: Perspectives on Self-Determination Theory. South African Journal of Psychology, 34(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630403400201
Naveen Kumar. (2026). 77 Statistik AI dalam Pendidikan 2026 (Tren & Fakta Global). DemandSage.
Ran, X., Li, Z., & Yang, Y. (2025). An Analysis of Factors Influencing Chatbots on College Students’ Programming Self-learning Ability. SAGE Open, 15(3), 21582440251375649. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251375649
Resita Eka Fransiska, Mislaini, & Ibnu Fikri. (2025). Pengaruh Kecerdasan Buatan Terhadap Minat Belajar Mahasiswa UIN Imam Bonjol Padang. At-Tarbiyah, 2(2).
Riyadi, S., Budiyanto, E., Hastuti, H., & Nofriansyah, N. (2025). PEMANFAATAN CHATBOT AI UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMANDIRIAN BELAJAR SISWA: SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW. Research and Development Journal of Education, 11(2), 1106. https://doi.org/10.30998/rdje.v11i2.25003
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Seitz, L. (2024). Artificial empathy in healthcare chatbots: Does it feel authentic? Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(1), 100067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100067
Seung, Y., & Basham, J. D. (2026). Cognitive Offloading in the Age of Generative AI: What Does It Mean for Students With Learning Disabilities? Learning Disability Quarterly, 07319487261439132. https://doi.org/10.1177/07319487261439132
Sims, C., Moursounidis, J., Sheffield, R., Thompson, N., Singh, A., Bunn, A., & Sha, L. (2026). AI am Motivated: Leveraging Self-Determination Theory in Chatbots. Acta Pedagogia Asiana, 5(1), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v5i1.950
Siregar, M., Majidah, H., Sitio, R., & Harahap, T. R. (2022). The Role of Autonomy, Competence and Relatednes in Efforts to Increase Student Involvement in Face-to-Face Learning Post-COVID 19; Perspective of Self Determination Theory. EduLine: Journal of Education and Learning Innovation, 2(4), 491–497. https://doi.org/10.35877/454RI.eduline1359
Siti Badriah & Surawan Surawan. (2025). Peran Self-Determination dalam Meningkatkan Ketekunan Belajar Mahasiswa di Era Digital. Observasi : Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Psikologi, 3(3), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.61132/observasi.v3i3.1506
Siti Maftukha & Istiqomah. (2023). Heuristik: Cara Berpikir Manusia Yang Sempit. Buletin KPIN: Konsorsium Psikologi Ilmiah Nusantara, 9(9).
Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4
Thomas K.F.Chiu. (2024). A classification tool to foster self-regulated learning with generative artificial intelligence by applying self-determination theory: A case of ChatGPT. Cultural and Regional Perspectives, 72, 2401–2416.
Vansteenkiste, M., Ryan, R. M., & Soenens, B. (2020). Basic psychological need theory: Advancements, critical themes, and future directions. Motivation and Emotion, 44(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-019-09818-1
Wang, C. K. J., Liu, W. C., Kee, Y. H., & Chian, L. K. (2019). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness in the classroom: Understanding students’ motivational processes using the self-determination theory. Heliyon, 5(7), e01983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01983
Xia, Q., Chiu, T. K. F., Lee, M., Sanusi, I. T., Dai, Y., & Chai, C. S. (2022). A self-determination theory (SDT) design approach for inclusive and diverse artificial intelligence (AI) education. Computers & Education, 189, 104582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104582
Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The effects of over-reliance on AI dialogue systems on students’ cognitive abilities: A systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7
Zhang, Y., Zhao, D., Hancock, J. T., Kraut, R., & Yang, D. (2025). The Rise of AI Companions: How Human-Chatbot Relationships Influence Well-Being (Version 4). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2506.12605
Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a Self-Regulated Learner: An Overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
