Muslim Societies, Civil and Political Rights, and The Guarantee of Religious Freedom: A Comparative Study Between Indonesia and Turkiye Constitutions
Abstract
Until the middle of the 20th century, many Muslim population countries became free and independent countries following the end of world colonization. Those countries try to adopt several modern political and legal values, including establishing democracy and state constitutions. One of the constitution's contents in a democratic country is guaranteeing and strengthening civil and political rights. Civil and political rights regulation should be written in a partial part of the constitution as a commitment to live in modern democratic circumstances. Philosophically, citizens' civil and political rights in democratic circumstances cannot be restricted by government. Nevertheless, a gap in the legal argument regarding the limitation of civil and political rights in constitutions is constantly discussed. This article looks at civil and political rights limitations in two cases in different countries: Indonesia and Turkiye. These two countries were chosen as subjective data based on the legal system's proximity pattern and socio-religious conditions. Both countries are also close to the civil law system and have historical references to Islam. In addition, both countries have experience with the restriction of religious organizations. Indonesia has dealt with the restriction of Hizbut Tahrir Movement. Meanwhile Turkiye has experience in banning Gulen Movement. By this background, some questions emerge: How do Indonesian and Turkish constitutions, as Muslim population countries, guarantee human rights issues? By using a comparative legal study and a sociological-empirical approach, this article compares the Indonesian and Turkiye constitutions to see how the two countries guarantee human rights, predominantly civil and political rights. The result of this article reveals that national consensus, national security, stability, and legitimate political power are some of the legal arguments that are always present in the discourse on restrictions on human rights. Under these conditions, human rights restrictions are commonly regulated in the constitution, which contains human rights laws.
References
Adsay, Ismail. “The Impact of the 2016 Turkish Military Coup on Politics in Turkiye.” International Journal of Science and Society 2, no. 2 (May 11, 2020): 15–20. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v2i2.87.
Aswar, Hasbi, Danial Bin Mohd Yusof, and Rohana Binti Abdul Hamid. “The State Response toward the Existence of HTI: An Analysis from Social Movement Study Approach.” Sospol : Jurnal Sosial Politik 6, no. 2 (October 10, 2020): 183–200. https://doi.org/10.22219/sospol.v6i2.12908.
Azra, Azyumardi, Islamic Political Transformation: Radicalism, Khilafatism, and Democracy, Kencana, 2016.
Carnegie, Paul J., “Democratization and Decentralization in Post-Soeharto Indonesia: Understanding Transition Dynamics,” Pacific Affairs 81, no. 4 (2009): 515–25. https://doi.org/10.5509/2008814515.
Crittenden, Elizabeth L. “Restrictions on Political Activities of Government Employees.” Research Repository. Virginia: West Virginia University, 1984.
David, Rene, et.al, Major Legal Systems in the World Today: An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Law, New York: The Free Press, 1978.
Donnelly, Jack. The Concept of Human Rights. Routledge, 2019.
Donnelly, Jack. Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. Cornell University Press, 2003.
Dreher, Sabine. “What Is the Hizmet Movement? Contending Approaches to the Analysis of Religious Politics in World Politics.” Koninklijke Brill NV, Koninklijke Brill NV.
“Erdoğan’s Campaign of Hate Speech. Case of Targeting the Gülen’s Movement 2013-2017.” Stockholm Center for Freedom, May 2017.
Esposito, John L, The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Modern Islamic World, vol. IV (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).
Esposito, John L. and Voll, John Obert, Islam and Democracy, Oxford University Press, 1996.
Göle, Nilüfer, “Secularism and Islamism in Turkiye: The Making of Elites and Counter-Elites,” Middle East Journal 51, no. 1 (1997): 46–58.
“FETO Declared Terrorist Organization by 42 Asian Nations.” Accessed August 3, 2024. https://www.aa.com.tr/en/july-15-coup-bid/feto-declared-terrorist-organization-by-42-asian-nations/697306.
Franz, Erhard. “Secularism and Islamism in Turkiye.” In The Islamic World and the West: An Introduction to Political Cultures and International Relations, 71:161–75. Social, Economic and Political Studies of the Middle East and Asia. Brill, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047400370_014.
“Government Memorandum on the Measures Taken During The State of Emergency Relevant to the Freedom of the Media.” Opinion. Venice: European Commision for Democracy through Law (Venice Commision), 2017.
Hefner, Robert W., Civil Islam: Muslims and Democratization in Indonesia, Princeton University Press, 2011.
Hikam, Muhammad AS, Islam, Demokratisasi dan Pemberdayaan Civil Society (Islam, democratization, and empowerment of civil society), Jakarta: Erlangga, 2000.
Klein, Eckart. “‘On Limits and Restrictions of Human Rights: A Systematic Attempt.’” In Strengthening Human Rights Protections in Geneva, Israel, the West Bank and Beyond,. Edited by Joseph E. David, Yaël Ronen, Yuval Shany, and J. H. H. Weiler. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.
Locke, John. An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. J. Johnson [and 18 others], 1805.
Locke, John. Locke: Two Treatises of Government Student Edition. Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Marfiando, Bayu. “Pembubaran Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI) Ditinjau Dari Kebebasan Berserikat.” Jurnal Ilmu Kepolisian 14, no. 2 (2020): 89–101. https://doi.org/10.35879/jik.v14i2.253.
Mello, Patrick A. “A Comparative Analysis of Constitutional and Political Restrictions on the Use of Force.” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2014. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2477716.
Menchik, Jeremy, Islam and Democracy in Indonesia: Tolerance without Liberalism, Cambridge University Press, 2016.
Yamin, Mohammad, “The Minutes of the Assemblies of the Investigative Body for the Preparation of Indonesian Independence and the Preparatory Committee for Indonesian Independence in connection with the preparation of the 1945 Constitution” (Secretariat of the Republic of Indonesia, 1959), Excerpted from the Preparatory Manuscript of the 1945 Constitution.
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia (Decision of the Constitutional Court), No. 39/PUU-XV/2017 § (2017).
Rikza, Ayu. “The Securitization of Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia.” Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review 5, no. 2 (August 21, 2020): 172–91. https://doi.org/10.15294/ipsr.v5i2.21712.
Sabah. “Silahlı terör örgütü’ tanımı yargıtay kararıyla tescillendi.” Accessed August 3, 2022. https://www.sabah.com.tr/gundem/2017/06/17/silahli-teror-orgutu-tanimi-yargitay-karariyla-tescillendi.
Yilmaz, Ihsan, and John L Esposito. Islam and Peace Building: Gülen Movement Initiatives. New York: Blue Dome Press, 2010.
Copyright (c) 2023 Borneo International Journal of Islamic Studies (BIJIS)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
