Rekonstruksi Filsafat Psikologi dan Psikiatri Integratif: Sintesis Ontologi, Epistemologi, dan Aksiologi melalui Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
Abstrak
Filsafat psikologi memiliki peran fundamental dalam membangun landasan konseptual, metodologis, dan etis bagi perkembangan ilmu psikologi. Namun, kajian mengenai ontologi, epistemologi, dan aksiologi psikologi di Indonesia masih tersebar pada berbagai publikasi dan belum tersintesis secara komprehensif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi, memetakan, dan mensintesis perkembangan kajian filsafat psikologi di Indonesia melalui pendekatan Systematic Literature Review (SLR). Penelitian dilaksanakan dengan mengadopsi pedoman PRISMA melalui tahapan identifikasi, penyaringan, penilaian kelayakan, dan sintesis artikel yang diperoleh dari basis data ilmiah nasional dan internasional. Kriteria inklusi mencakup artikel yang membahas dimensi ontologi, epistemologi, atau aksiologi psikologi dalam konteks Indonesia dan dipublikasikan pada jurnal ilmiah terindeks. Hasil sintesis menunjukkan bahwa kajian filsafat psikologi di Indonesia masih didominasi oleh pembahasan epistemologi, khususnya mengenai paradigma penelitian dan pendekatan metodologis, sedangkan kajian ontologi dan aksiologi relatif lebih terbatas. Selain itu, ditemukan kecenderungan integrasi perspektif psikologi modern dengan nilai-nilai budaya lokal, agama, dan konteks sosial Indonesia sebagai upaya membangun identitas keilmuan yang lebih kontekstual. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi berupa pemetaan komprehensif terhadap perkembangan filsafat psikologi di Indonesia sekaligus menawarkan arah pengembangan penelitian yang lebih integratif, multidisipliner, dan relevan dengan tantangan psikologi kontemporer di Indonesia.
References
Cher, D. (2024). Philosophy meets psychoanalysis: A review of John Riker's Kohut's self psychology for a fractured world: New ways of understanding the self and human community. Psychoanalysis, Self and Context. https://doi.org/10.1080/24720038.2024.2394790
Eronen, M. I., & Bringmann, L. F. (2021). The theory crisis in psychology: How to move forward. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 779–788. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620970586
Falcato, A., & Gonçalves, J. (Eds.). (2023). The philosophy and psychology of delusions: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Routledge.
Furley, P., & Goldschmied, N. (2021). Systematic vs. narrative reviews in sport and exercise psychology: Is either approach superior to the other? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 685082. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685082
Gibson, Q. H. (2024). The science and moral psychology of addiction: A case study in integrative philosophy of psychiatry. Crítica (México, DF).
Gough, J. (2022). The myth of the mental? Motivating the no-mind thesis in philosophy, psychology, psychiatry, and cognitive science [Doctoral thesis]. University of Sussex.
Herman, P. Y. (2023). Kajian deskriptif tentang ontologi, epistemologi, dan aksiologi dalam filsafat ilmu. Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15554024
Kair, L. A. (n.d.). Mental health philosophy: Counseling, wellbeing, and psychology [Unpublished manuscript].
Lubis, R. D. G. I., Latief, I. S., & Nurhayati, T. (2024). Peran filsafat ilmu dalam pendekatan ilmiah. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 2(1), 192–202. https://doi.org/10.59841/intellektika.v2i1.839
Mendonca, B. I. O., Coutinho, D. M. B., et al. (2023). Gestalt therapy, mundane phenomenology, and yoga philosophy: An integrated praxis in psychology. Theory & Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X231154007
Nobile, H., Randjbar Moshtaghin, N. L., Lüddecke, Z., Schnarr, A., & Mertz, M. (2023). What can the citations of systematic reviews of ethical literature tell us about their use? An explorative empirical analysis of 31 reviews. Systematic Reviews, 12, 173. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02341-y
Pereira, J. G. (2024). The philosophy and psychology of delusions: Historical and contemporary perspectives: edited by Ana Falcato and Jorge Gonçalves. Philosophical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2024.2360784
Piazza, M., & Vincenti, D. (2023). The unconscious before the unconscious: Philosophy, psychology and psychiatry in nineteenth-century France. In Philosophy and madness: From Kant to the present.
Pretorius, L. (2024). Demystifying research paradigms: Navigating ontology, epistemology, and axiology in research. The Qualitative Report, 29(10), 2698–2715. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.7632
Rybalka, V., Samodryn, A., & Voznyuk, O. (2020). Philosophy, psychology and pedagogics against COVID-19: Manual. Institute of Pedagogical and Adult Education, National Academy of Educational Sciences of Ukraine.
Shirvani, E. (2025). Meaning in a purposeless cosmos: An interdisciplinary integrative review of philosophy, psychology, and science. The Open Psychology Journal.
Syafriandi, Fatimah, S., & Fitrisia, A. (2025). Aksiologi: Peran filsafat ilmu dalam transformasi nilai dalam masyarakat. Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora, 5(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.53697/iso.v5i1.2512
Tsou, J. Y. (2025). Philosophy of psychology and psychiatry. In F. Padovani & A. T. Tuboly (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of the history of philosophy of science after Kant. Routledge.
Van Zyl, L. E., Gaffaney, J., van der Vaart, L., Dik, B. J., & Donaldson, S. I. (2023). The critiques and criticisms of positive psychology: A systematic review. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 18(2), 206–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2023.2178956
Wendler, H. (2025). Philosophy, science, and practice: Modelling depression as a paradigm for a clinical psychology of value. Philosophy, Psychiatry, & Psychology.
Worrell, M. (2022). CBT and existential psychology: Philosophy, psychology and therapy. Routledge.
