Dualism of Tiktok’s Algorithmic Impact: Disruption of Students’ Sexual Identity in Islamic Education at Palangkaraya Universities
Abstract
Over 62% of Muslim college students report encountering LGBTQ+ content on TikTok-how does Islamic education respond to this digital exposure?. This study explores the dual impact of TikTok’s algorithm and its usage intensity on the formation of sexual identity and orientation among Muslim students at State General Universities (PTUN) in Central Kalimantan. This study used a mixed-method approach with a Concurrent Embedded design, in which combined quantitative regression analysis of Likert-scale questionnaire data (N = 312) and qualitative thematic analysis from in-depth interviews and literature reviews. The sample was determined using stratified random sampling based on students' semester levels. The study results TikTok significantly influences students' sexual identity and orientation (r = 0.583, p < 0.01), while Islamic education has a more modest effect (r = 0.299, p < 0.01). Together, both variables explain 46% of the variation (R² = 0.460). Notably, 70% of respondents reported experiencing value conflict after being exposed to sexual content. Regression results indicate that TikTok and Islamic education together explain 46% of the variance (R² = 0.460) in students’ sexual identity orientation. No significant link was found between TikTok usage and internalization of Islamic values (r = -0.079, p = 0.214), suggesting parallel but disconnected development paths. These findings call for urgent integration of digital Islamic literacy to Islamic education curriculum to mitigate the effect of TikTok’s algorithm, and use of social media da’wah within Islamic education frameworks to confront algorithmic influences effectively.
References
Adima, M. F. (n.d.). Tren literasi digital dalam perspektif Islam di perguruan tinggi: Tinjauan bibliometric, Skripsi, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung.
Afendi, H. A. R., & Khojir, M. (2024). Pendidikan Islam abad 21 (inovasi dan implementasinya). Palembang: Bening Media Publishing.
Agustin, M. (2024). Media pembelajaran berbasis Iptek sebagai sarana pendidikan agama Islam di era Society 5.0. Paramurobi: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 7(1), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.32699/paramurobi.v7i1.6686
Agustina, L. (2020). Viralitas konten di media sosial. Majalah Semi Ilmiah Populer Komunikasi Massa, 1(2), 149–160.
Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jomed.2024.100051
Akhyar, M., Deliani, N., & Khadijah, K. (2025). The importance of religious education in the digital era. International Journal of Islamic Educational Research, 2(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.61132/ijier.v2i1.146
Alhamdu, A. (2015). Orientasi seksual; faktor, pandangan kesehatan dan agama. Jurnal Ilmu Agama: Mengkaji Doktrin, Pemikiran, dan Fenomena Agama, 16(1), 120–140. https://doi.org/10.19109/jia.v16i1.503
Ali, N., & Noor, S. (2019). “Pendidikan Islam multikultur: Relevansi, tantangan, dan peluang.” Jurnal Hadratul Madaniyah, 6(1), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.33084/jhm.v6i1.879
Ali, Z. Z., dan M. Puspita. (2023). Pembaharuan Hukum Keluarga di Asia Tenggara: Dari Negara Mayoritas sampai Minoritas Muslim. Yogyakarta: Jejak Pustaka.
Arifah, A., dan A. R. Ashidiq. “Aspek Hukum dan Tantangan Etika Jurnalisik dalam Penyebaran Konten Viral di Era Digital: (Studi di Kabupaten Toboali, Bangka Selatan).” Jurnal Syntax Imperatif: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan 5, no. 4 (2024): 847–848. https://doi.org/10.36418/syntaximperatif.v5i4.486.
Ashari, M. K., Faizin, M., & Shiddiq, J. (2023). Religious Digital Literacy of Students in Indonesia and Malaysia. TADRIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 18(1), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.19105/tjpi.v18i1.8794
Bailey, J. M., et al. "Sexual Orientation, Controversy, and Science." Psychological Science in the Public Interest 17, no. 2 (2016): 45–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100616637616.
Bintang, A. (2021). Sosial Pedia. Sukabumi: Jejak Publisher.
Creamer, E. G. (2017). An Introduction to Fully Integrated Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
E. Zulaiha, N. N. Djamal, dan T. Supriyatin, (2019), “Materi Parenting Education tentang Pendidikan Seks bagi Remaja dalam Islam menurut Abdullah Nashih Ulwan,” Intizar 25(1): 43–54.. https://doi.org/10.19109/intizar.v25i1.3795
Eccles, T. A., et al. (2004). “More Normal than Not: A Qualitative Assessment of the Developmental Experience of Gay Male Youth.” Journal of Adolescent Health 35: 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.02.015.
Egan, S. K., dan D. G. Perry. (2001). “Gender Identity: A Multidimensional Analysis with Implications for Psychosocial Adjustment.” Developmental Psychology, 37(4): 451–463.
Fahmi, U. (2023). “Dampak Penggunaan Media Sosial TikTok bagi Perilaku Keagamaan Remaja di Kecamatan Bandar Baru Kabupaten Pidie Jaya.” Disertasi doktor, UIN Ar-Raniry Fakultas Dakwah dan Komunikasi.
Fathoni, S. (2022). “Reforming Islamic education in Iran: Creating an emancipated and creative generation”. SYAMIL: Journal of Islamic Education, 10(2), 79–92. https://doi.org/10.21093/sy.v10i2.4750
Fauzi, M., Arifin, M. S., & Umam, H. (2022). “Fenomena mandi lumpur live TikTok dalam perspektif Islam”. Al-Ibrah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Keilmuan Islam, 7(2), 110–129. https://doi.org/10.61815/alibrah.v7i2.209
Fitri, A., Triantoro, D. A., Nurrahmi, F., & Haekal, M. (2024). “Digital literacy and Islamic Sharia values as a new perspective of preventing OGBV”. Jurnal Komunikasi, 18(2), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol18.iss2.art2
Ghazali, D. S., Fatimah, S., Ismail, R., & Aini, N. (2024). “Tantangan dan peluang dalam penyebaran Islam pada kemajuan teknologi: Challenges and opportunities in the spread of Islam in technological advances”. LITERA: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1(2), 161–171.
Ginting, D. R., Habib, F., & Siregar, R. A. (2024). “Pengaruh konten dakwah di media sosial TikTok terhadap tingkat religiusitas mahasiswa KPI FDK UIN Sumatera Utara”. Jurnal Kajian Islam dan Sosial Keagamaan, 1(3), 90–95.
Hafida, B. (2025). Digital media literacy as a mechanism for developing digital awareness among university students in the virtual environment—Proposed framework. مجلة الحكمة للدراسات الفلسفية ) 13(1), 144–164.
Hamsiah, H. (2023). Penerapan blended learning untuk mengatasi kejenuhan pebelajar dalam pembelajaran bahasa Arab kelas XI MAN 2 Parepare, Disertasi doktor, IAIN Parepare.
Hazari, A. (2024). Sampling types and methods. In Research methodology for allied health professionals: A comprehensive guide to thesis & dissertation. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
Hidayat, A., Fatimah, S., & Rosidin, D. N. (2021). “Challenges and prospects of Islamic education institutions and sustainability in the digital era”. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 351–366. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v5i2.1475
Igartua, K., Thombs, B. D., Burgos, G., Montoro, R., & Lazarus, L. (2004). “Concordance and discrepancy in sexual identity, attraction, and behavior among adolescents”. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35(6), 602–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.03.019
Ionescu, C. G., & Licu, M. (2023). “Are TikTok algorithms influencing users' self-perceived identities and personal values? A mini review”. Social Sciences, 12(8), 465. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12080465
Kang, H., & Lou, C. (2022). “AI agency vs. human agency: Understanding human–AI interactions on TikTok and their implications for user engagement”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 27(5), Article zmac014. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcmc/zmac014
Karizat, N., Delmonaco, D., Eslami, M., & Andalibi, N. (2021). Algorithmic folk theories and identity: How TikTok users co-produce knowledge of identity and engage in algorithmic resistance. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5(CSCW2), 1–44.
Kiswari, R., Manalu, S. R., & Rahardjo, T. (2023). “Memahami pengungkapan diri individu lesbian gay bisexual dan transgender (LGBT) di media social”. Interaksi Online, 11(3), 220–234.
Klimstra, T. A., Hale III, W. W., Raaijmakers, Q. A. W., Branje, S. J. T., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2024). “A systematic review of social media use and adolescent identity development.” Adolescent Research Review, 9(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40894-024-00251-1
Laka, L., Nugroho, A., Putri, F. N., & Ramadhani, R. (2024). Pendidikan karakter Gen Z di era digital. Jakarta: PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Malik, M. S. (2020). “Technological innovation in integration and interconnection of science in Islamic higher education”. Sunan Kalijaga International Journal on Islamic Educational Research, 4(2), 1–20.
Masturin, S. A. (2022). Manajemen pembelajaran pendidikan agama Islam berbasis multikultural. Semarang: Penerbit Lawwana.
Mayer, L. S., & McHugh, P. R. (2016). “Sexuality and gender: Findings from the biological, psychological, and social sciences”. The New Atlantis, (50), 10–143.
McKenna, S. (2022). “Assessing the impacts of Instagram body image ideals on the health & well-being of adolescent girls and young women: Public Health Dissertation Prize Winner”. Public Health Institute Journal, 1(1), 17.
Muslem, M. M. A., & Zulkifli, M. Y. (2024, November). “Integrasi pendidikan akhlak dalam kurikulum pendidikan sekolah tinggi Islam di era digital”. INSTRUKTUR: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 4(1), 173–180. https://doi.org/10.51192/instruktur.v4i1.1507
Muzani, S., & Shofa, L. H. (2013). Gender dalam perspektif syari’ah Islamiyah. Sawwa: Jurnal Studi Gender, 9(1), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.21580/sa.v9i1.672
Nguyen, K., Nguyen, N., Cao, P., Vo, L., & Kieu, T. (2024). “Understanding AI-based content recommendation experience perceptions on short-video platforms and enhancing customer engagement: The mediation of empathy and self-congruence”. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–17.
Noor, F. A. (2014). “The influence of religious authority in the age of social media: Islamic preachers and the 'ulama' in Southeast Asia”. Journal of Religion and Society, Supplement Series, 9, 1–18.
Novianti, L., Rahmadika, S., & Rahayu, W. (2024). “Persepsi civitas akademika tentang LGBT dalam tinjauan hukum Islam dan hak asasi manusia serta upaya dalam menangkal pertumbuhannya di lingkungan kampus”. Al-Ahwal Al-Syakhsiyyah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Peradilan Islam, 5(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v5i1.34000
Nugraha, A. P., Kurnia, A., Putra, P. I. P., Rahman, A., & Dikrurahman, D. (2024). “The impact of social media on social interaction and self-identity in Indonesian society”. Journal of Social Research, 3(9). https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v3i9.2254
Paechter, C. (2018). Gender and the philosophy of education. In International Handbook of Philosophy of Education.
Pahlevi, R., & Utomo, P. (2024). “Gender dan perilaku sosial mahasiswa: TikTok sebagai tren kekinian, braggadocian behavior hingga hiperrealitas dan pengaruhnya terhadap perilaku mahasiswa di kampus IKIP ‘SLW’.” Jurnal Hawa: Studi Pengarusutamaan Gender dan Anak, 6(1), 25–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/hawapsga.v6i1.4043
Pradana, F. (2024). The filter bubble trap: The effect of TikTok media on language use and interaction among communication science students at UINSU. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi dan Media Sosial (JKOMDIS) 4(2): 481–490. https://doi.org/10.47233/jkomdis.v4i2.1771
Priyono. (2021). Analisis regresi dan korelasi untuk penelitian survei (panduan praktis olah data dan interpretasi: Dilengkapi cara perhitungan secara manual). Bogor: Guepedia.
Rachmawati, F., Muhajarah, K., & Kamaliah, N. (2019). “Mengukur efektivitas podcast sebagai media perkuliahan inovatif pada mahasiswa”. Justek: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi, 2(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/10.31764/justek.v2i1.3750
Retsikas, K. (2021).” Religion in the digital age: Media, performance, and new avenues of Islamic preaching in Indonesia”. Contemporary Islam, 15(1), 45–64.
Sagala, R., & Kandedes, I. (2024). “The role of Islamic education teachers in addressing the negative impact of TikTok on teenagers in Lampung, Indonesia”. Millah: Journal of Religious Studies, 23(2), 947–990. https://doi.org/10.20885/millah.vol23.iss2.art14
Santoso, I. A. P., Anwar, S., & Waluyo, S. D. (2020). “Peran Siberkreasi dalam meningkatkan kemampuan literasi digital untuk mencegah aksi radikalisme”. Peperangan Asimetris (PA), 6(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.33172/pa.v6i1.530
Sholichah, A. S. (2020). Pendidikan karakter anak pra akil balig berbasis Al-Quran. Pekalongan: Penerbit NEM.
Silvana, H. (2024). Pendidikan literasi digital remaja dalam penerimaan pesan pada media sosial. Jakarta: Damera Press.
Simpson, E. (2020). “For you, or for “you”?: Everyday LGBTQ+ encounters with TikTok”. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–13). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376712
Siregar, H. L., Rismawany, P., Pulungan, L. S., & Harahap, F. A. (2024). “Analisis pengaruh media sosial terhadap nilai keislaman mahasiswa Universitas Negeri Medan”. Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Terpadu, 8(6).
Sujana, K., Hariyadi, S., & Purwanto, E. (2018). “Hubungan antara sikap dengan perilaku peduli lingkungan pada mahasiswa”. Ecopsy, 5(2), 81–87. https://dx.doi.org/10.20527/ecopsy.v5i2.5026
Suroso, A., Hendriarto, P., Mr, G. N. K., Pattiasina, P. J., & Aslan, A. (2021). Challenges and opportunities towards Islamic cultured generation: Socio-cultural analysis. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(1), 180–194. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v5n1.1203
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Usman, H. (2012). Pengantar statistika. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
We Are Social & Meltwater. (2025, Maret 8). 8 negara dengan rata-rata durasi mengakses TikTok di HP terlama. GoodStats. https://data.goodstats.id/statistic/10-negara-dengan-pengguna-tiktok-terbesar-indonesia-urutan-berapa-xFOgI
Wulandari, A., Firnanda, A. C., Nariswari, T. S., & Agustinova, D. E. (2022). Implications of using the TikTok application on the character of students at Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta. In International Conference of Social Science and Education (ICOSSED 2021) (pp. 80–88). Atlantis Press.
Yusof, N. M., Ahmad, F., & Hashim, R. (2022). Integrating Islamic ethics in digital media literacy: A framework from Malaysian higher education institutions. Journal of Islamic Educational Studies, 12(1), 45–59.
Zhang, H., Zhu, Z., & Caverlee, J. (2023). Evolution of filter bubbles and polarization in news recommendation. In European Conference on Information Retrieval (pp. 685–693). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Copyright (c) 2025 Nuraliah Ali, Mulida Hayati, Abdul Ziqron Mopoliu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Please find the rights and licenses in SYAMIL Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam (Journal of Islamic Education). By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
SYAMIL spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, SYAMIL permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Register on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
The right to self-archive the article (please read out deposit policy),
The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (SYAMIL Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam (Journal of Islamic Education)).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. SYAMIL will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. SYAMIL will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that SYAMIL entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
SYAMIL will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. SYAMIL editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.