Pengaruh Program Musyawarah Guru Mata Pelajaran (MGMP) dan Musyawarah Kelompok Kerja Kepala Sekolah (MKKKS) terhadap Peningkatan Kinerja Guru di Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara
Abstract
Apathy about teacher performance in schools is one reality. The fact of the tendency of doubt about the performance of the teacher could have been caused by the absence of the development of knowledge and skills related to the four teacher competencies. On the other hand, there is still a problem regarding the lack of systematic management of school performance programs that are not managed systematically and are not in accordance with the education calendar that has been formulated and established so that in daily implementation the school is always changing, disrupting the learning process that has been determined. To overcome these obstacles a place for teachers and principals is needed that aims to gather various new information and experiences in the industrial era 4.0. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the Subject Teachers' Consultation and School Principal Working Groups simultaneously on Improving Teacher Performance in Kutai Kartanegara District. This type of research is a field research with a quantitative approach. Data collection techniques in this study used a questionnaire and documentation. Data validity test uses validity test, normality test and classic assumption test. Data analysis techniques using multiple linear regression test. Based on the results of the study note that there is no simultaneous effect between the Subject Teachers' Deliberation Program and the Principal Working Group Conference on Improving Teacher Performance in Kutai Kartanegara District. The absence of this influence is due to the the Subject Teachers' Deliberation Program and School Principal Working Groups in Kutai Kartanegara Regency which are considered not working properly according to the planned program. Whereas on the other hand it is considered a lack of support from stakeholders in the area, in this case the government which oversees the Subject Teachers' Deliberation Program and School Principal Working Groups. So based on data between the Subject Teachers' Deliberation Program and School Principal Working Groups, they have not synergized well.
References
Jannah, Fathul, Manajemen Akademik: Lembaga Pendidikan Tinggi Islam, (Yogyakarta: Safiria Insania Press, 2009).
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 74 Tahun 2008 Tentang Guru.
Santoso, Agus dan Andi Achmad, Desain Revisi Penilaian Kurikulum 2013 Tahun 2017: Studi pada Mata Pelajaran Sejarah Kebudayaan Islam di Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara, (Syamil: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, Vol. 6 No. 1).
Santoso, Agus dan Muhammad Nasir, Pengaruh Discovery dan ekspository Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Sekolah Dasar Negeri Kota Samarinda, (Syamil: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, Vol. 4 No. 2).
Please find the rights and licenses in SYAMIL Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam (Journal of Islamic Education). By submitting the article/manuscript of the article, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.
1. License
The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
2. Author(s)' Warranties
The author warrants that the article is original, written by stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).
3. User/Public Rights
SYAMIL spirit is to disseminate articles published are as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, SYAMIL permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes only. Users will also need to attribute authors and Register on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published.
4. Rights of Authors
Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;
Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
The right to self-archive the article (please read out deposit policy),
The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (SYAMIL Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam (Journal of Islamic Education)).
5. Co-Authorship
If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any authors submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf, and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. SYAMIL will not be held liable for anything that may arise due to the author(s) internal dispute. SYAMIL will only communicate with the corresponding author.
6. Royalties
Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, author(s) aware that SYAMIL entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees.
7. Miscellaneous
SYAMIL will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article’s editorial process is successfully completed. SYAMIL editors may modify the article to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible and such access will be free of charge for the readers as mentioned in point 3.