Character Values and Their Internalization in Teaching and Learning English at Madrasah
Keywords:
Character values, Internalization, and Character Education
Abstract
Language is more than to express the ideas, believe, and thought or as intellectual based, it also expresses the norms, values, and even emotions. As the result, it is important to internalize the character values into the teaching and learning activity of English. Since the focus of this study was on the analysis of the internalization of character values without any experimental or manipulated settings involved, the design of this study was qualitative. The results showed that there were at least six character values performed by the students in learning English, they were independent, hardworking ethos, curiosity, democratic attitude, communicative manner, and reading interest. In addition, the character values were internalized by the English teacher into the process of teaching and learning even though she did not realize it.References
Asmani, Jamal M. 2012. Buku Panduan Internalisasi Pendidikan Karakter di Sekolah. Jogjakarta: DIVA Press.
Berkowitz, Marvin W., 2002. The Science of Character Education, in William Damon ed., Bringing in a New Era in Character Education. California Stanford University, Hoover Institution.
Berkowitz, Marvin W & Bier, Melinda C. 2005. What Works In Character Education: A research-driven guide for educators. Washington, DC: Character Education Partnership.
Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. 2006. Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods. Allyn & Bacon.
Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. 2008. Cambridge University Press.
Curriculum And Books Center, Department Of Research And Development. 2011. Pedoman Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Karakter (Berdasarkan Pengalaman di Satuan Pendidikan). Jakarta: Ministry of National Education.
Denzin, N. K. 1978. The Research Act in Sociology. Chicago: Aldine.
Directorate General of Elementary Education. 2011. Policy Brief: Pendidikan Karakter untuk Membangun Karakter Bangsa. Edisi 4 Juli. Jakarta: Ministry of National Education.
Halstead, J. Mark. 2007. Islamic values: a distinctive framework for moral education? Journal of Moral Education. 36 (3), 283–296.
Harms, Kristyn & Fritz, Susan. 2001. Internalization of Character Traits by Those Who Teach Character Counts! Journal of Extension. 39 (6), 1 – 12.
Huitt, W. 2004. Moral and character development. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University.
Hussen et.al, 2010. Model Pendidikan Karakter Bangsa. Jakarta: Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. 1973. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David McKay Co. Inc.
Li, Ziang. 2012. A Summary about Practice of Communicative Approach in Real Collage English Teaching. Sino-US English Teaching. 9 (3), 996-1004.
Lickona, Thomas. 2005. “The Return of Character Education”, in Noll, James Wm., Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Educational Issues. Iowa: McGraw-Hil.
Lickona, Schaps, and Lewis 2010. CEP’s Eleven Principles of Effective character Education. Washington, DC: Character Education Partnership.
Matera, D. 2001. A cry for character. Paramus: Prentiss Hall Press.
Miles, M., & Huberman, A.M. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Ministry of National Education. 2010. Kerangka Acuan Pendidikan Karakter Tahun Anggaran 2010. Jakarta.
Ministry of National Education. 2010. Panduan Guru Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris: Pendidikan Karakter Terintegrasi dalam Mata Pelajaran di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jakarta.
Ministry of National Education. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan. 2010. Pedoman Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Karakter: Berdasarkan Pengalaman di Satuan Pendidikan Rintisan. Jakarta.
Nord, Warren & Charles Haynes. 2000. The relationship of religion to moral education in the public schools. George Washington University: The Communitarian Network.
Ritchie, J., Lewis J., Elam G. 2003. Designing and Selecting Samples. In Ritchie, J. & Lewis, J. (Eds). Qualitative Research Practice a Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers (p. 77-104). London: SAGE Publication.
Rubin, J. & Thompson, I. 1982. How to be a more successful language learner. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publisher.
Shaaban, Kassim. 2005. “A Proposed Framework for Incorporating Moral Education into the ESL/EFL Classroom.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 18.(2): 201-217.
Shank, G. 2002. Qualitative Research. A Personal Skills Aproach. New Jersey: Merril Prentice Hall.
Tafsir, Ahmad. 2001. Metodologi Pegajaran Agama Islam. Bandung, Remaja Rosdakarya.
Tsui, Cheng-Fang. 2008. Character Education in Demand for the University EFL Classroom. Foreign Language Study. 8 (06), 85-101.
Webster, R. Scott. 2010. Does the Australian National Framework for Values Education Stifle an Education for World Peace? Educational Philosophy and Theory. 42 (4), 462-475.
Winkel, WS. 2009. Psikologi Pengajaran. Yogyakarta: Media Abadi,
Yaqin, Ainul. 2011. Efektivitas Pembelajaran Afeksi di Madrasah/Sekolah. ISLAMICA. 6 (1), 190-202.
Berkowitz, Marvin W., 2002. The Science of Character Education, in William Damon ed., Bringing in a New Era in Character Education. California Stanford University, Hoover Institution.
Berkowitz, Marvin W & Bier, Melinda C. 2005. What Works In Character Education: A research-driven guide for educators. Washington, DC: Character Education Partnership.
Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. 2006. Qualitative research in education: An introduction to theory and methods. Allyn & Bacon.
Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary. 2008. Cambridge University Press.
Curriculum And Books Center, Department Of Research And Development. 2011. Pedoman Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Karakter (Berdasarkan Pengalaman di Satuan Pendidikan). Jakarta: Ministry of National Education.
Denzin, N. K. 1978. The Research Act in Sociology. Chicago: Aldine.
Directorate General of Elementary Education. 2011. Policy Brief: Pendidikan Karakter untuk Membangun Karakter Bangsa. Edisi 4 Juli. Jakarta: Ministry of National Education.
Halstead, J. Mark. 2007. Islamic values: a distinctive framework for moral education? Journal of Moral Education. 36 (3), 283–296.
Harms, Kristyn & Fritz, Susan. 2001. Internalization of Character Traits by Those Who Teach Character Counts! Journal of Extension. 39 (6), 1 – 12.
Huitt, W. 2004. Moral and character development. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University.
Hussen et.al, 2010. Model Pendidikan Karakter Bangsa. Jakarta: Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. 1973. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, the Classification of Educational Goals. Handbook II: Affective Domain. New York: David McKay Co. Inc.
Li, Ziang. 2012. A Summary about Practice of Communicative Approach in Real Collage English Teaching. Sino-US English Teaching. 9 (3), 996-1004.
Lickona, Thomas. 2005. “The Return of Character Education”, in Noll, James Wm., Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Educational Issues. Iowa: McGraw-Hil.
Lickona, Schaps, and Lewis 2010. CEP’s Eleven Principles of Effective character Education. Washington, DC: Character Education Partnership.
Matera, D. 2001. A cry for character. Paramus: Prentiss Hall Press.
Miles, M., & Huberman, A.M. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Ministry of National Education. 2010. Kerangka Acuan Pendidikan Karakter Tahun Anggaran 2010. Jakarta.
Ministry of National Education. 2010. Panduan Guru Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris: Pendidikan Karakter Terintegrasi dalam Mata Pelajaran di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jakarta.
Ministry of National Education. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan. 2010. Pedoman Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Karakter: Berdasarkan Pengalaman di Satuan Pendidikan Rintisan. Jakarta.
Nord, Warren & Charles Haynes. 2000. The relationship of religion to moral education in the public schools. George Washington University: The Communitarian Network.
Ritchie, J., Lewis J., Elam G. 2003. Designing and Selecting Samples. In Ritchie, J. & Lewis, J. (Eds). Qualitative Research Practice a Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers (p. 77-104). London: SAGE Publication.
Rubin, J. & Thompson, I. 1982. How to be a more successful language learner. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publisher.
Shaaban, Kassim. 2005. “A Proposed Framework for Incorporating Moral Education into the ESL/EFL Classroom.” Language, Culture and Curriculum 18.(2): 201-217.
Shank, G. 2002. Qualitative Research. A Personal Skills Aproach. New Jersey: Merril Prentice Hall.
Tafsir, Ahmad. 2001. Metodologi Pegajaran Agama Islam. Bandung, Remaja Rosdakarya.
Tsui, Cheng-Fang. 2008. Character Education in Demand for the University EFL Classroom. Foreign Language Study. 8 (06), 85-101.
Webster, R. Scott. 2010. Does the Australian National Framework for Values Education Stifle an Education for World Peace? Educational Philosophy and Theory. 42 (4), 462-475.
Winkel, WS. 2009. Psikologi Pengajaran. Yogyakarta: Media Abadi,
Yaqin, Ainul. 2011. Efektivitas Pembelajaran Afeksi di Madrasah/Sekolah. ISLAMICA. 6 (1), 190-202.
Published
2016-12-12
How to Cite
Islami, M. (2016). Character Values and Their Internalization in Teaching and Learning English at Madrasah. Dinamika Ilmu, 16(2), 279-289. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v16i2.417
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
