A Tale of English Language Polytechnic Lecturers’ Decision Making

  • Suhaily Abdullah Jabatan Pengajian Am, Politeknik Sultan Azlan Shah, Behrang Stesen, Perak, Malaysia.
  • Faizah Abd Majid Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor
Keywords: decision making, language teaching, TVET institution, polytechnic lecturers

Abstract

Teacher decision making involves a selection of options that leads to thinking processes, underlying teaching in language classroom contexts. Due to this, as a small part of an on-going postgraduate research, this exploratory case study shares the initial findings on the lecturers’ decision-making effects on their classroom orientation. Four lecturers in a local polytechnic were purposively selected as research participants. The primary data was collected through non-participatory classroom observations. Manual constant comparative analysis across the cases was run to obtain the results. Later, the results were triangulated with the responses from informal semi-structured interviews and reflective journal entries. The qualitative analysis revealed that participants did share a similar teaching pattern, i.e. active teaching.  The participants employed learner-focused-orientation approach as their common teaching practice. They worked on their planning decisions as well as their interactive decisions in order to harmonize their teachings to students’ response, proficiency, and attitude. This finding informs some instructional concerns regarding language teaching and learning process in polytechnics’ context (as a Technical and Vocational Education and Training, or TVET, higher education institution in Malaysia) to other English educators in different types and levels of learning institutions.

Author Biographies

Suhaily Abdullah, Jabatan Pengajian Am, Politeknik Sultan Azlan Shah, Behrang Stesen, Perak, Malaysia.
A fulltime lecturer at Politeknik Sultan Azlan Shah and a part-time PhD student at Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor.
Faizah Abd Majid, Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor
An associate professor  who attaches to Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Selangor. Her areas of expertise include Adult Education, Advanced Literacy, ESL Reading & Writing, Professional Development.

References

Bailey, K. M., Curtis, A., & Nunan, D. (2001). Pursuing Prefessional Development: The Self as Source. Canada: Heinle and Heinle.
Barnett, J. B., (2011). Culturally Competent ELL Teachers: An Examination of Their Epistemological Beliefs and Reflective Practices. Unpublished dissertation. Retrieved 10 May 2013 from http://www.proquest.com
Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching Research, 36(2), 81–109
Borg, S. (2011). The impact of in-service teacher education on language teachers’ beliefs. System, 39, 370-380
Borg, S., & Al-Busaidi, S. (2012). Learner Autonomy : English Language Teachers ’ Beliefs and Practices. ELT Research Papers, 7.Clark, V.L.P. & Creswell, J.W. (2010). Understanding research – A consumer’s guide. New Jersey: Pearson Education (as Merrill).
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approches. Singapore: SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: Sage Publication.
Ellis, E. M., (2006). Language learning experience as a contributor to ESOL teacher cognition. TESL-EJ, 10(1), 1-16.
Farrell, T. S. C., & Bennis, K. (2013). Reflecting on ESL teacher beliefs and classroom practices : A Case Study. RELC Journal, 44(2), 163–176. http://doi.org/10.1177/0033688213488463
Gutierrez, M. R. C. (2004). Studying teacher cognition: The interplay of teacher beliefs and instructional practice. Kritika Kultura, 4. 53-78.
Han, X., & Song, L. (2011). Teacher Cognition of Intercultural Communicative Competence in the Chinese ELT Context. Intercultural Communication Studies, XX(1), 175–192.
Harun, M. & Al-Amin, S.. (2013). Continuous teacher development through reflective teaching and action research. Bangladesh Research Publications Journal, 8(1), 69–78.
Hora, M. T. (2012). A Situative analysis of the relationship between faculty beliefs and teaching practice: Implications for instructional improvement at the postsecondary level (WCER Working Paper No. 2012-10). Retrieved on 4 April 2016 from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/workingPapers/papers.php
Johnston, B. (2003). Values in English Language Teaching. New Jersey: Laurence Erlbaum Associates Publisher.
Larsen-Freeman, D., & Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and principles in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lavigne, A. L. (2014). Beginning teachers who stay : Beliefs about students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 39, 31–43. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.12.002
Marwan, A. (2009). ESP teaching challenges in an Indonesian vocational higher institution. The English Teacher, XXXVIII, 1–12.
Nurusus, E. et al. (2015). Exploring teachers’ beliefs in teaching grammar. The English Teacher, XLIV(1), 23-32.
Richards, J. C. (2008). Second language teacher education today. RELC Journal, 39(2): 158-177.
Richards, J. C. (2010). Competence and performance in language teaching. RELC Journal, 41(2), 101-122.
Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1996). Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Suhaily, A., & Faizah, A. M. (2013). Reflection on language teaching practice in polytechnic : Identifying sources of teachers’ beliefs. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 813–822.
Susilo, S. (2015). Curriculum of EFL Teacher Education and Indonesian Qualification Framework: A Blip of the Future Direction. Dinamika Ilmu, Vol. 15 No 1, 2015
Woods, D. (1997). Decision-making in language learning: A lens for examining learner strategies. The Language Teacher Online, 21(10), 1-7.
Published
2016-06-01
How to Cite
Abdullah, S., & Abd Majid, F. (2016). A Tale of English Language Polytechnic Lecturers’ Decision Making. Dinamika Ilmu, 16(1), 135-147. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v16i1.436