Integrative Learning in History Education: A Systematic Literature Review

  • Atqo Akmal UIN Imam Bonjol Padang
Keywords: History Education, Integrative Learning, Interdisciplinary Understanding


In general, history is a construction of the past that should use models, methods, and concepts of other social sciences to explain the changes or events throughout human life and civilization. Thus, the assumption that history should be explained from a broader perspective of social sciences and the deep analysis of social theory has transformed the need for an interdisciplinary approach in history education. In the quest for an advanced learning approach to history education, this article proposes integrative learning as an approach that could meet the need for the integration of various perspectives and theories from social science disciplines in learning history. Constructively explained through a systematic literature review of related studies oriented towards history, interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, and integrative learning, this article works on the possibility of integration encompassing four steps, namely establishing a purpose, understanding and leveraging disciplinary insights, leveraging integration, and critical stance. Despite the lack of empirical research, integrative learning is a promising concept that could improve the method of fostering high-order thinking skills in history education.


Ahmad, T. A., Sodiq, I., & Suryadi, A. (2014). Kendala-Kendala Guru dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah Kontroversial di SMA Negeri Kota Semarang. Paramita: Historical Studies Journal.
Bain, R. B. (2006). Rounding Up Unusual Suspects: Facing the Authority Hidden In the History Classroom. Teachers College Record.
Barber, J. P. (2012). Integration of Learning: A Grounded Theory Analysis of College Students’ Learning. American Educational Research Journal.
Barber, J. P., King, P. M., & Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2013). Long Strides on the Journey toward Self-Authorship: Substantial Developmental Shifts in College Students’ Meaning Making. The Journal of Higher Education, 84(6), 866–896.
Bloom, B. S., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. In Handbook I: Cognitive Domain.
Braudel, F. (2009). History and The Social Sciences: The Longue Durée. In Review.
Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2014). An Instructional Model to Support Problem-Based Historical Inquiry: The Persistent Issues in History Network. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning.
Bryan, K. S., & Klein, J. T. (1998). Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities. History of Education Quarterly.
Burke, P. (1990a). The French historical revolution. The Annales School, 1929-89. The French Historical Revolution. The Annales School, 1929-89.
Burke, P. (1990b). The French historical revolution. The Annales School, 1929-89. The French Historical Revolution. The Annales School, 1929-89.
Burke, P. (1993). History and Social Theory. In Cornell paperbacks.
Church, W. F. (1976). Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie. The Peasants of Languedoc. Tr. with an Introduction by John Day. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1974. 370 pp. $16. Renaissance Quarterly, 29(2), 238–242.
Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a Systematic Review. In The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Research Methods.
Duraisingh, L. D., & Mansilla, V. B. (2007). Interdisciplinary forays within the history classroom: how the visual arts can enhance (or hinder) historical understanding. Teaching History.
Fink, C., Dosse, F., & Conroy, P. V. (1996). New History in France: The Triumph of the Annales. The American Historical Review.
Gardner, H., & Boix-Mansilla, V. (1994). Teaching for Understanding: Within and across the Disciplines. Educational Leadership.
Harsgor, M. (1978). Total History: The Annales School. Journal of Contemporary History.
Haynes, C., & Association for Integrative Studies. (2002). Innovations in interdisciplinary teaching. In American Council on Education/Oryx Press series on higher education.
Huber, M. T., Hutchings, P., & Huber, Mary-Taylor; Hutchings, P. (2004). Integrative Learning: mapping the terrain. Association of American Colleges and Universities and the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Hunt, L. (1986). French History in the Last Twenty Years: The Rise and Fall of the Annales Paradigm. Journal of Contemporary History.
Hunter, P. (2018). Problematised History Pedagogy as Action Research in Preservice Secondary Teacher Education. Educational Action Research.
Ivanitskaya, L., Clark, D., Montgomery, G., & Primeau, R. (2002). Interdisciplinary Learning: Process and Outcomes. In Innovative Higher Education.
Johnson, C. S. (ed). (2005). Integrative Learning. Peer Review.
Klein, J. T. (2005). Integrative Learning and Interdisciplinary Studies. Peer Review.
Klein, J. T. (2010). A Taxonomy of Interdisciplinarity. In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity.
Klein, J. T. (2018). Learning in transdisciplinary collaborations: A conceptual vocabulary. In Transdisciplinary Theory, Practice and Education: The Art of Collaborative Research and Collective Learning.
Leonard, J. B. (2007). Integrative Learning As a Developmental.
Leonard, J. B. (2012). Integrative Learning: a grounded theory. Dean Student Academic Affairs, Advising, and Retention George Mason University.
Lonning, R. a., DeFranco, T. C., & Weinland, T. P. (1998). Development of Theme-Based, Interdisciplinary, Integrated Curriculum: A Theoretical Model. School Science and Mathematics.
MacLeod, M. (2018). What Makes Interdisciplinarity Difficult? Some Consequences of Domain Specificity in Interdisciplinary Practice. Synthese, 195(2), 697–720.
MacLeod, M., & van der Veen, J. T. (2020). Scaffolding Interdisciplinary Project-Based Learning: a Case Study. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(3), 363–377.
Magolda, M. B. (2014). Research Article. New Directions for Higher Education, 2014(166), 25–33.
Mansilla, V. B. (2005). Assessing Student Work at Disciplinary Crossroads. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning.
Mansilla, V. B. (2008). Integrative Learning: PeerReview.
Mansilla, V. B. (2010). Learning to synthesize: A cognitive-epistemological foundation for interdisciplinary learning. In The handbook of interdisciplinarity.
Mansilla, V. B. (2016). Interdisciplinary Learning: A cognitive-Epistemological Foundation. In Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity.
Mansilla, V. B., & Duraisingh, E. D. (2007). Targeted Assessment of Students’ Interdisciplinary Work: An Empirically Grounded Framework Proposed. The Journal of Higher Education.
Mansilla, V. B., Duraisingh, E. D., Wolfe, C, R., & Haynes, C. (2009). Targeted Assessment Rubric: An Empirically Grounded Rubric for Interdisciplinary Writing. The Journal of Higher Education.
Marshall, G., & Skocpol, T. (1986). Vision and Method in Historical Sociology. The British Journal of Sociology.
Massey, D. D. (2015). Reading History: Moving from Memorizing Facts to Critical Thinking.
Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., Stewart, L. A., Estarli, M., Barrera, E. S. A., Martínez-Rodríguez, R., Baladia, E., Agüero, S. D., Camacho, S., Buhring, K., Herrero-López, A., Gil-González, D. M., Altman, D. G., Booth, A., … Whitlock, E. (2016). Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Revista Espanola de Nutricion Humana y Dietetica.
Newell, W. H. (1990). Interdisciplinary Curriculum Development. Issues in Integrative Studies.
Pati, D., & Lorusso, L. N. (2018). How to Write a Systematic Review of the Literature. Health Environments Research and Design Journal.
Perkings, D. (1998). What is Understanding? In Teaching for understanding: linking research with practice.
Retz, T. (2016). At the Interface: Academic History, School History and The Philosophy of History. Journal of Curriculum Studies.
Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (2002). Scaffolding Critical Reasoning about History and Social Issues in Multimedia-Supported Learning Environments. Educational Technology Research and Development.
Saye, J. W., & Brush, T. (2007). Using Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments to Support Problem-based Historical Inquiry in Secondary School Classrooms. Theory and Research in Social Education.
Shemilt, D. (2018). Assessment of Learning in History Education: Past, Present, and Possible Futures. In The Wiley International Handbook of History Teaching and Learning.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research.
Subakti. (2010). Paradigma Pembelajaran Sejarah Berbasis Konstruktivisme. Journal Seri Pengetahuan Dan Pengajaran Sejarah.
Sutimin, L. A., Sariyatun, S., & Abidin, N. F. (2018). The Development of Deconstructive Learning History Model to Promote the Higher Order Thinking Skill of University Students. New Educational Review.
Swanson, H. A., Svenning, J. C., Saxena, A., Muscarella, R., Franklin, J., Garbelotto, M., Mathews, A. S., Saito, O., Schnitzler, A. E., Serra-Diaz, J. M., & Tsing, A. L. (2021). History as Grounds for Interdisciplinarity: Promoting Sustainable Woodlands via an Integrative Ecological and Socio-Cultural Perspective. In One Earth (Vol. 4, Issue 2, pp. 226–237). Cell Press.
Thorp, R., & Persson, A. (2020). On Historical Thinking and The History Educational Challenge. Educational Philosophy and Theory.
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. In British Journal of Management.
van Hover, S., Hicks, D., & Irwin, W. (2007). Beginning Teachers Thinking Historically?: negotiating the Context of Virginia’s High-Stakes Tests. The International Journal of Social Education.
Wineburg, S. (1999). Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts. In Phi Delta Kappan.
Wong, G., Greenhalgh, T., Westhorp, G., Buckingham, J., & Pawson, R. (2013). Meta-Narrative Reviews. Journal of Advanced Nursing.
How to Cite
Akmal, A. (2022). Integrative Learning in History Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Dinamika Ilmu, 22(2), 375-392.