Schools Through the Perspective of Students from Different Countries: The Case of Spain, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Romania, and Turkey
Abstract
This research was carried out to determine the perceptions of schools of students studying in five European Union countries (Spain, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Romania) and the candidate country Turkey. In the study, the data were obtained through the student opinion form created by the researchers and analyzed by content analysis. In the study, it was determined that most of the students had a positive perception towards the school and described the school with positive concepts, metaphors, emotions, and values. Students with a positive perception of school have described school with the concepts of learning, friendship, future, development, entertainment, life, responsibility; positive emotions such as success, happiness, trust, pleasure, interest, love, joy, and respect; value expressions such as helpfulness, friendship, empathy; and with the house, family, home metaphors. It has also been understood that some of the students (13%) have a negative perception of school, they do not like school, and they continue to school because it is compulsory. It was among the findings of the research that the students with a negative perception of school have described school by metaphors expressing physical and emotional discomfort such as boredom, suffering, headache, burnout; and metaphors emphasizing the restriction of freedom such as prison, captivity, and watch tower. In addition, it has been determined that students with negative perceptions have individual and organizational reasons for these perceptions. In the research, it was concluded that there are common meanings in students’ perceptions of school in different countries towards the school, and no matter what language they speak, the students describe the school with similar thoughts and feelings. In this direction, suggestions have been made to increase the awareness of executives and policymakers about students' perceptions of school, to consider the interests and needs of students in the physical design of schools, to implement support programs that will enable students to develop a positive perception of the school, and to conduct longitudinal studies examining the reasons for these perceptions of students with negative perceptions.
References
Andersson, B. E. & Strander, K. (2004). Perceptions of school and future adjustment to life: a longitudinal study between the ages of 18 and 25. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48(5), 459-476. DOI:10.1080/003138042000272122
Alexa, S., & Baciu, E.L. (2021). School dropout and early school leaving in Romania: Tendencies and risk factors. Revista Romaneasca pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(2), 18-38. DOI:10.18662/rrem/13.2/408
Arslan, P. (2020). Metaphors related to the concept of school. International Journal of Leadership Studies: Theory and Practice, 3(1), 1-14.
European Commission (2014). Tackling Early Leaving from Education and Training in Europe: Strategies, Policies and Measures. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union.
Aydin, I. (2019). Ethics in education and training. Ankara: PEGEM-A. 10th Edition.
Aydin-Elmas, S. & Demir, E. (2018). 5th grade students' metaphorical perceptions of school concept. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences Year, 51(3), 45-70.
Bayón-Calvoa, S., Corrales-Herreroc, H. & De Witted, K. (2020). Assessing regional performance against early school leaving in Spain. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 1-13. DOI:10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101515
Botha, E. (2009). Why metaphor matters in education. South African Journal of Education, 29, 431-444.
Cerdà-Navarro, A., Quintana-Murci, E. & Salvà-Mut, F. (2022). Reasons for dropping out of intermediate vocational education and training in Spain: the influence of sociodemographic characteristics and academic background. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 18 DOI:10.1080/13636820.2022.2049625
Christle, C. A., Jolivette, K. & Nelson, C. M. (2007). School characteristics related to high school dropout rates. Remedial And Special Education, 28(6), 325–339.
Creswell, J.W. (2020). Qualitative research methods: Qualitative research design according to five approaches (M. Tüm & S.B. Demir, Trans. Ed). Ankara: Political.
Demirci, C. & Toptas, H.T. (2021). Teachers' and students' opinions about the reasons of secondary education students' absenteeism in Europe and Turkey. Journal of Advanced Education Studies, 3(1), 73-85. DOI:10.48166/ejaes.886603
Dewey, J. (1956). School and society. In M. S. DWORKIN (Ed.), Dewey on Education. New York: Teacher's College Press.
Donmez, S. & Tayli, A. (2018). Examining the perception of school climate, school engagement and quality of school life in secondary school students. Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 9(2), 1-17.
Dos, I. (2013). Happy school. Education and Science, 38 (170), 266-280.
Eryilmaz-Balli, F. & Kartal, S. (2020). Drop-out studies: A systematic analysis study. Kırıkkale University Journal of Social Sciences (KÜSBD), 10(2), 257-278.
Eurostat (2021). Early leavers from education and training. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Early_leavers_from_education_and_training.
European Commission (2018). Education and training Monitor 2018. Spain. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.
Gatto, J. T. (2019). Education: A Weapon of Mass Destruction. (Trans. Mehmet Ali Özkan) Istanbul: EDAM
Gorghiu, L.M., Enache, R.C., Petrescu, A.M.A. & Gorghiu, G. (2020). Several Causes and Sustainable Solutions of School Dropout in Romania. In I. Panagoreţ & G. Gorghiu (vol. ed.), Lumen Proceedings: Vol. 10th International Conference Globalization, Innovation and Development. Trends and Prospects (G.I.D.T.P.) (pp. 335-343). Lasi, Romania: LUMEN Publishing House. DOI:10.18662/lumproc/gidtp2018/37
Gubbels, J., van der Put, C. E. & Assink, M. (2019). Risk factors for school absenteeism and dropout: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 48, 1637–1667.
Guio, j., Choi, Á. & Escardíbul, J. O. (2018) Labor markets, academic performance and school dropout risk: evidence for Spain. International Journal of Manpower, 39(2), 2018 pp. 301-318 DOI:10.1108/IJM-08-2016-0158
Gulcemal, E. (2019). The relationship between school attitude and school perception and students' drop-out behavior. PhD Thesis: Hacettepe University, Department of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
Hosgorur, V. & Polat, M. (2015). Reasons for absenteeism of secondary school students (Söke District example). Journal of Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University Faculty of Education, 2(1), 25-42.
Illich, I. (2018). Deschooling society, (Trans. Mehmet Özay) Istanbul: Şule Publications.
Inbar, Dan E. (1996). The free educational prison: metaphors and images. Educational Research, 38(1), 77–92. DOI:10.1080/0013188960380106
Karacabey, M. F., Boyaci, A. (2018). Factors contributing to secondary school dropouts and the dropouts' socioeconomic profiles: Şanlıurfa Sample. Educational Management in Theory and Practice, 24(2), 247-293 DOI:10.14527/kuey.2018.007
Key, E. (1909). The century of the child. New York: G. P. Putnam's sons.
Kilpatrick, W. H. (1921). The project method. New York: Teacher's College Press
Kpolovie, P.J., Joe, A.I. & Okoto, T. (2014). Academic achievement hrediction: Role of interest in learning and attitude towards school. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE), 1(11), 73-100.
Kremer, S. N. (2014). History begins in sumer. (Trans. Hamide Koyukan), Istanbul: Kabalci Publishing House
Merriam, S. B. (2018). A guide to qualitative research, design and practice (S. Turan, Trans. Ed.). Istanbul: Nobel.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Montessori, M. (1988). The Discovery of the Child. Oxford: Clio
Neuendorf, K. A., & Kumar, A. (2016). Content analysis. The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, 1-10. DOI:10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc065
Ozdemir, M. & Kalayci, H. (2013). A study on school engagement and metaphorical school perception: The case of Çankırı. Educational Sciences in Theory and Practice, 13(4), 2125-2137.
OECD (2019). PISA 2018 Results. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/publications/pisa-2018-results.htm.
Ozdemir, Y. (2015). School burnout in middle school students: The role of homework, school engagement and academic motivation. Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(1), 27-35.
Ozden, M. & Saban, A. (2019). Paradigm and theoretical foundations in qualitative research. A. Saban & A. Ersoy (Ed.), In qualitative research designs in education (pp. 1-30). Ankara: Memoir.
Patton, M. Q. (2018). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (M. Tüm, S.B. Demir, Trans. Ed.). Ankara: Pegem.
Rodríguez-Izquierdo, R. M. (2022). Identifying factors and inspiring practices for preventing early school leaving in diverse Spain: teachers' perspectives, Intercultural Education, 58, 1-17. DOI:10.1080/14675986.22021.2018191
Saban, A. (2008). School metaphors. Erducational Administration: Theory and Practice, (55), 459-496.
Ucak, S. & Dogan, Z. G. (2020). School as a mass “revival” tool. Literature, 1(1), 39-46. DOI:10.22596/cresjournal.0101.39.46
Uzun, K. & Kemerli, S. (2019). Reasons for absenteeism of secondary school students: The case of Fethiye District. Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Education Journal of Educational Sciences, 10(2), 1-19.
Yuner, B. & Ozdemir, M. (2017). Examination of the relationship between metaphorical perception of school and tendency to drop out according to students' views. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Education Faculty, 37(3), 1041-1060.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
