The Ability of Indonesian EFL Learners in Writing Academic Papers
Abstract
This study is meant to examine the thesis quality of students of English Department at IAIN Samarinda. Through the descriptive-quantitative research, the thesis quality of students of English Department at IAIN Samarinda is reviewed from the aspects of language, structure, concepts understanding, theoretical framework, methodology, content, writing mechanism, and references used. This study also tries to figure out any factors that affect the thesis quality of English Department students. Fourteen English Department Students’ thesis tested in 2013 are used as the main data. In addition, other data are obtained from respondents i.e. 19 students, and informants i.e. lecturers of English Department who are also their thesis advisors. The result shows that the average score of thesis written by 14 English Department students at IAIN Samarinda academic year of 2013 is 3.16 which is in the range of 2.61-3.40 scale, which is quite good quality. This quality is relevant with the informants’ perceptions about the quality of thesis written by their students. Judging from some aspects, they assume that their students are able to write a good quality of thesis with an average score of 2.81 which is at a scale of 2.61-3.40. The quality is affected by internal factors and external factors. The most decisive internal factor is the respondents’ low score of writing with appropriate and acceptable structure in English. This is the effect of respondents’ lack of ability of composing adequate paragraphs in English. Meanwhile, the most concerning external factor is the quality of learning structure course and the professionalism of the informants in guiding the students to improve their writing ability in thesis writing.
References
Ariyanti, A. (2016a). Shaping Students’ Writing Skills Shaping Students' Writing Skills: The Study of Fundamental Aspects in Mastering Academic Writing. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 1(11), 2503–4197.
Ariyanti, A. (2016b). The Teaching of EFL Writing in Indonesia, 16(2), 2442–9651. http://doi.org/10.21093/di.v16i2.274
Ariyanti, A., & Fitriana, R. (2017). EFL Students’ Difficulties and Needs in Essay Writing. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 158, 111–121.
Asik, N. (2015). Peningkatan Kemampuan Menulis Karya Ilmiah melalui Pendekatan Pembelajaran Kolaboratif. Bahter : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 14(2), 168–183.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. New York: Pearson Education.
Chamot, A. U., & O’Mailey, J. M. (1994). The Calla Handbook Implementing Cognitif Academic Language Approach. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Cheung, Y. L. (2012). Understanding the Writing of Thesis Introductions: An Exploratory Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 744–749.
Cumming, A., Lai, C., & Cho, H. (2016). Students’ Writing from Sources for Academic Purposes: A Synthesis of Recent Research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 47–58.
De Poel, K., & Gasiorek, J. (2012). Effects of an Efficacy Focused Approach to Academic Writing on Student’ perceptions of themselves as Writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 294–303.
Fanani, Z. (2001). Ketajaman Analisis. In Pembudayaan Penulisan Karya Ilmiah. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press.
Hamzah. (2012). An Analysis of the Written Gramatical Errors Produced by Freshment Student in English Essay Writing. Jurnal Bahasa Dan Seni, 6(1), 17–25.
Hermayati. (2010). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Bahasa Inggris Mahasiswa. Jurnal Sosio-Humaniora, 1(1).
Huang, D. F. (2015). Exploring and Assessing Effectiveness of English Medium Instruction Courses: the Students’ Perspectives. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 173, 71–78.
Husin, M. S. (2008). Problems of Writing in A Foreign Language. Samarinda.
Jordan, R. R. (1997). English For Academic Purposes: A Guide and Resource Book for Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jordan, R. R. (1999). Academic Writing Course: Study Skills in English. New York: Longman-Pearson Education Ltd.
Klimmova, B. F. (2015). Designing an EAP Course. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 634–638.
Kuntarto, N. M., & Putranto, H. (2015). 99 Cara Menulis Karya Ilmiah. Yogyakarta: Indopublika.
Lancaster, Z. (2017). Expressing Stance in Undergraduate Writing: Discipline Specific and General Qualities. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 16–30.
Lyons, L., & B., H. (2009). Study Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maharsi, I. (2007). Academic Writing Experince of Under Graduate Students of Industrial Technology. Yogyakarta: Sanata Dharma University.
Megawati, F. (2016). Kesulitan Mahasiswa dalam Mencapai Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris secara Efektif. Jurnal Pedagogia, 5(2), 147–156.
Mike and Smith, G. (1990). A Study Skills Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mohammed, A. S. (2015). Conjunctions as Cohesive Devices in the Writings of English as Second Language Learners. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 208, 74–81.
Ozdemir, E., & Aydin, S. (2015). The Effects of Wiki on Motivation in EFL Writing. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191(2359 – 2363).
Padmadewi, N. N. (2016). Keterampilan Menulis Wacana Argumentasi Bebrbahasa Inggris dengan Metode ESA (Engage, Study, Active) pada Mahasiswa level Post Intermediete di STIE Tratmia Mulya. LINGUITIKA, 23(44).
Persada, D. A. K. (2016). Studi Kompetensi Kemampuan Menulis dikalangan Mahasiswa. Jurnal MUADDIB, 6(1).
Pratama, H. (2017). Permasalahan dalam Skripsi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris. Jurnal Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan, 46(1), 2–11.
Prihatmi, T. N. (2017). English Academic Writing bagi Mahasiswa di Institut Teknologi Nasional Malang: Hambatan dan Solusi. In Seminar Nasional Inovasi dan Aplikasi Teknologi Industri. Malang.
Putra, N. (2011). Research and Development Penelitian dan Pengembangan suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: PT. Rajawali Press.
Rachmawati, F. (2001). Sudah Benarkah Tulisanku (Penyuntingan). Yogyakarta: Citra AjiParana.
Rasyidah, U., & Antoni, R. (2014). Analisis Kemampuan Mahasiswa PBI semester VI Universitas Pasir Pengairan dalam Menulis Critical Essay. Jurnal Ilmiah Edu Research, 3(1), 21–30.
Sanu, L. O. (2016). Narrative Paragraph Writing of the Second Semester Student of State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN) Samarinda A Syntactic Analysis. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching, 1(1), 36–45.
Shi, L. (2012). Rewriting and Paraphassing Source Texts in Second Language Writing. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 21(2), 134–148.
Stapa, S. H., Rizam, T. N., Maasim, T. M., & Aziz, M. S. A. (2013). Identifiying Problems in Writing Thesis Introductions in Research Methodology Class. Procedia Social Behavioral and Science, 112, 497–502.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Supriyadi. (2015). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Menulis Karya Ilmiah Berpendekatan konstruktivisme. Jurnal LITERA, 14(2), 361–375.
Wahyuni, S. (2017). The Effect of Different on Writing Quality of College Student with Different Cognitive Styles. DINAMIKA ILMU, 17(1), 39–58.
White, K., & Hall, A. H. (2014). Examining Teachers Perceptions of Effective Writing Strategies & Barriers to Implement. Clemson: Tiger Prints, Eugene T.Moore School of Education.
Wigati, F. A. (2015). Kesulitan pada Aspek-aspek Writing Mahasiswa dengan English Proficiency Levels yang Berbeda. Jurnal Ilmiah Solusi, 1(3), 46–61.
Yaqin, M. A. (2015). Faktor Penyebab rendahnya Penggunaan Referensi Berbahasa Inggris dalam Penulisan Skripsi Ilmu Perpustakaan. FIHRIS, 10(2), 105–126.
Zemach, D. E., & Rumisek, L. A. (2005). Academic Writing: From Paragraph to Essay. Oxford: Macmillan
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work