Evaluation of Introduction to Academic Culture and Student Affairs (PBAK) UIN Antasari Banjarmasin

  • Nida Mufidah UIN Antasari Banjarmasin
  • Muhammad Noval UIN Antasari Banjarmasin
  • Musyarrafah Sulaiman Kurdi UIN Antasari Banjarmasin
  • Muhammad Hendrie Fauzan Universitas Negeri Semarang
Keywords: evaluation, student affairs, academic, material

Abstract

This research aims to obtain information regarding participants' responses regarding the materials presented in Introduction to Academic Culture and Student Affairs (PBAK) activities.  The subjects of this study were PBAK students batch 2018 and 2019, totaling 6198 students. Extracting data using questionnaires, observations, interviews, and documentation. The results of this study indicate that the implementation of PBAK batch 2018 and 2019 can be accepted by students which the materials mostly in positive responses,  (1) correlate with the adjustment attitude of PBAK participant  98,37 % positive responses on history, vision and mission of UIN Antasari Banjarmasin, (2)  there is  94, 56 % positive responses regarding the Islamic and national insight material, ( 3) participants also responded 97.33% positively to study success and organizations in Higher Education material, (4) social environmental responsibility is 96,86 %  in positive response, (5) there are 96.57% students gave positive responses regarding the material on critical analysis of the implementation of the student government concept, (6) the total number of applicants expressed positive responses cosmopolitan millennials with morals and social care and transformation and agent of win manifesto towards civilized people were more about that  97.53% , (7)  the material of  intrapersonal and interpersonal skills material, it is known that 96.86% of gave positive responses to this material, (8) the scientific writing material was 96,01% in positive response and (9) For 96,61 % positive response given to  students ethics material. The psychological impact felt by participants is the emergence of feelings of joy or happiness, usefulness, and motivation from participating in PBAK activities.

References

Agustana, Putu (2017) Prosiding Seminar: Revitalisasi Tata Kelola Perguruan Tinggi Juni 2017 (P.206-212). Unit Penerbitan (UP) Pusat Penelitian dan Pengabdian pada Masyarakat (P3M) Unipas Singaraja. ISBN 978-979-17637-3-8
Ausubel,D.P. and Robinson. (1969). School Learning, New Holt Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi pembelajaran (Vol. 152). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Arikunto, Suharsimi dan Cepi Safrudin Abdul Jabar. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2002), Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek, Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (1993). Manajemen Pengajaran Secara Manusiawi. Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2006). Prosedur Penelitiam Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2008). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Bungin, Burhan. (2007). Penelitian Kualitatif. Prenada Media Group.
Ary, Donald, et al. (2009). Introduction to Research in Education 8th Edition. Wadsworth Publishing.
Badu, S. Q. (2012). Implementasi evaluasi model Kirkpatrick pada perkuliahan masalah nilai awal dan syarat batas. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16, 102-129.
Booker, K. (2006). Building the connection: An evaluation of new student orientation at a women’s college. The Journal of Orientation and College Transition, 13(2), 5-9.
Boström, L., & Bostedt, G. (2020). What about study motivation? Students´ and teachers’ perspectives on what affects study motivation. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(8), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.26803/IJLTER.19.8.3
Bumgarner, L., Mathies, C., & Ranges, S. (1997). A larger research university’s approach to a one-day summer orientation program. The Journal of College Orientation and Transition, 5(1), 29-30.
Chen, Hefang (2005). University Academic Culture and University Academic Productivity. Journal of Higher Education. 26 (12).1-7
Cronbach, L. (1963) Course Improvement Through Evaluation, dalam Educational Evaluation: Theory and Practice (ed.Worthen, B.R. dan Sanders, J.R.), Wadsworth Pub.Co.
Darmalaksana, Wahyudin and Hambali, R. Yuli Ahmad and Masrur, Ali and Muhlas, Muhlas. (2021). Pengenalan Budaya Akademik dan Kemahasiswaan (PBAK): Studi Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung. UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung. https://digilib.uinsgd.ac.id/id/eprint/42424
Dobbs, Laura. (2002). Early Adulthood. www.mnstate.edu/kausar/psyc202/chapter _15.htm
Farjad, S. (2012). The Evaluation Effectiveness of Training Courses in University by Kirkpatrick Model (case study: Islamshahr University). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2837-2841.
Gentry, W.A., Kuhnert, K.W., Johnson, R.M., & Cox, B. (2006). Even a weekend works: The value of a weekend-long orientation program on first-year college students. The Journal of College Orientation and Transition, 14(1), 26-38.
Gunawan, I. (2011). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(1).
Hollins T. N. J. (2009). Examining the Impact of a Comprehensive Approach to Student Orientation. The Journal of the Virginia Community Colleges, 15-27. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ833916.pdf
Jacob, W. J., Sutin, S. E., Weidman J. C., Yeager J. L. (2015). Community Engagement in Higher Education: Policy Reforms and Practice. Springer.
Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan. (2019). Penyelenggaraan PBAK Tahun 2019 Nomor B-2184.5/Dj.I/PP.00.9/07/2019.
Kementrian Agama Republik Indonesia. (2020). Memperkuat Mentalitas dan Kemandirian Mahasiswa Melalui PBAK. Retrived from https://kemenag.go.id/opini/memperkuat-mentalitas-dan-kemandirian-mahasiswa-melalui-pbak-mzw59u
Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi, Direktorat Jenderal Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan. (2016). Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia Nomor 096/b1/sk/2016 tentang Panduan Umum Pengenalan Kehidupan Kampus Bagi Mahasiswa Baru.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (2009). Implementing the four levels: A practical guide for effective evaluation of training programs: Easyread super large 24pt edition. ReadHowYouWant. com.
Kirkpatrick, D., & Kirkpatrick, J. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Legault, L. (2020). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T.K. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_1139
Lessky, F., Nairz‐Wirth, E., & Feldmann, K. (2021). Informational capital and the transition to university: First‐in‐family students’ experiences in Austrian higher education. European Journal of Education, 56(1), 27–40. doi:10.1111/ejed.12437
Lubis, Mahdawati. (2022). Pelaksanaan Pengenalan Budaya Akademik Dan Kemahasiswaan (PBAK) Secara Zoom Meeting. Undergraduate thesis. UIN Sumatra Utara. http://repository.uinsu.ac.id/19516/1/COVER%20%283%29.pdf
Lyashenko, M. V. (2019). Motivation of learning activities: basic nations and issues, SUSU Bulletin, Edition. Education. Pedagogical Sciences, 11 (1), 53-73, 2019.
Mahmudi, I. (2011). CIPP: Suatu Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. At-Ta'dib, 6(1).
Mukhlis. (2014). Pendidikan Pembebasan dalam Pandangan Mansour Fakih” dalam Mukhrizal Arif, dkk, Pendidikan Pos Modernisme: Telaah Kritis Pemikiran Tokoh Pendidikan Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media., h. 243-244.
Mujiburrahman. (2017). Laporan Evaluasi Kegiatan OPAK 2015, 2016, dan 2017. Banjarmasin, UIN Antasari Banjarmasin.
Nadirova, A., & Burger, J. (2014). Assessing Student Orientation to School to Address Low Achievement and Dropping Out. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 60(2), 300-321. https://journalhosting.ucalgary.ca/index.php/ajer/article/view/55821/42659
Nadler, D.P., & Miller, M.T. (1997). Student satisfaction with orientation: A program assessment and cultural stratification. The Journal of Orientation and College Transition, 1997, 5(1), 7-13.
Noviana, A. (2010). Ospek dan fenomena kekerasan (studi fenomenologi tentang pelaksanaan ospek pada mahasiswa di FKIP UNS tahun ajaran 2008/2009). Undergraduate thesis. Sebelas Maret University. https://digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/detail/13707
Partner, C. (2009). Implementing the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model Plus.
Putri, A. N., Safitri, A. A., Febryanti, M., Salma, N. D., Umami, Z., Wardhana, I. S., Indratno, G. P., Martono N. (2024). Kekerasan Saat Ospek Tahun 2000-2022 Dalam Portal Berita Online. JSSH (Jurnal Sains Sosial dan Humaniora) 8 (1). https://jurnalnasional.ump.ac.id/index.php/JSSH/article/view/16756/0
Rajeev, P., Madan, M. S., & Jayarajan, K. (2009). Revisiting Kirkpatrick's model–an evaluation of academic training. Current Science, 96(2).
Reio, T. G., Rocco, T. S., Smith, D. H., & Chang, E. (2017). A critique of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model. New Horizons in Adult Education and Human Resource Development, 29(2), 35-53.
Roditti. Martha. (2001). Human Development: Children, Youth and Adult Development and the Effect of Child Maltreatment on Human Development. CalSWEC University of California
Santrock, Jhon W. (2002). Adolescence Perkembangan Remaja. Erlangga.
Sarwono, Sarlito Wirawan. (2004). Psikologi Remaja. PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Schreiner, L. A., Louis, M. C., Nelson, D. D. (2020). Thriving in Transitions: A Research-Based Approach to College Student Success. The National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience.
Shen, Xi; Tian, Xianghong. 2012. Academic Culture and Campus Culture of Universities. Canadian Center of Science and Education. Vol. 2, No. 2 2(2). https://doi.org/10.5539/hes.v2n2p61
Starke, M.C., Harth, M., & Sirianni, F. (2001). Retention, bonding, and Academic Achievement: Success of a first-year seminar. Journal of the Freshman Year Experience, 13(2), 7-35.
Sugiyono. (2013). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan; Pendekatan Kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Sukmadinata (2009), Pengembangan Kurikulum: Teori dan Praktek. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Suyanta. (2014) Paradigma Dalam pembelajaran di Perguruan Tinggi. Workshop Pelaksanaan PBM dan Evaluasi STMIK Kartika Yani, Jum’at 31 Oktober 2014.
Sunhaji, S. (2013). Konsep pendidikan orang dewasa. Jurnal Kependidikan, 1(1), 1-11. H. 5
Sukardi. (2009 ). Evaluasi pendidikan, Prinsip dan Operasionalnya. Bumi Aksara.
Sugiyono. (2009). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta
Sullivan, J. L. G. (2021). The Impact of Orientation Programs on New Students Engagement and Transition Thesis. Northeastern University. https://repository.library.northeastern.edu/files/neu:bz60qs831/fulltext.pdf
Tanzeh, Ahmad. (2009). Pengantar Metode Penelitian. Teras.
Tan, Tiejun (2011). On Deep Layer Perception and Construction of the Campus Culture of the Universities Journal
Tyler, R. W. (2013). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. In Curriculum Studies Reader E2 (pp. 60-68). Routledge.
Tyler, Ralph W. & Peter S. Hlebowitdh. (2013) Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction First Edition, Revised Edition. The US: the University of Chicago Press.
Undang-Undang Pendidikan Tinggi yaitu UU No. 12 Tahun 2012
Vetrinskaya, V. V., Poliakova, N. V., & Shabanova, V. P. (2020). The Use of Video Materials for the Development of Inner Motivation in Learning Foreign Languages of University Students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12), 7101–7108. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081277
Widoyoko, E. P. (2009). Evaluasi program pembelajaran (Vol. 91). Pustaka Pelajar.
Yusuf, A. M. (2017). Asesmen dan evaluasi pendidikan. Prenada Media.
Published
2024-06-30
How to Cite
Mufidah, N., Noval, M., Kurdi, M., & Fauzan, M. H. (2024). Evaluation of Introduction to Academic Culture and Student Affairs (PBAK) UIN Antasari Banjarmasin. Dinamika Ilmu, 24(1), 127-147. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v24i1.8551