Access to Justice for The Poors in The Sub Urban Area in The East Kalimantan
(Study of the Mobile Court in Religious Justice)
Abstract
Access to justice is a state guarantee to all its citizens, that every citizen must have access to justice. The facts on the ground, they are not easy to implement, due to the high costs of the case, the low public understanding of access to justice, low public awareness of accessing justice, as well as geographical conditions, especially with regard to distance travel and unsustainable transprotation. There are some religious courts that have very broad jurisdiction with geographical conditions, in which remote communities are not easy to reach the court office in question. One of the efforts made by the Supreme Court in the framework of justice for all, is a round trial. Whether the circuit court is capable of providing access to justice to remote communities, that's why this study is being conducted. Using the theory of legal effectiveness, the results of this study show that the execution of the mobile court the Religious Court of Tenggarong is effective and Religious Court of Sangata is not effective in giving access to justice because not all areas that are in the jurisdiction of religious courts fo Sangata are the place of execution. Besides, the public awareness is also low, as evidenced by the fact that sometimes the execution of circular hearings only few register.
References
Ali, Sapri. “Komparasi Hukuman Pidana Masyarakat Pinggiran Dalam Perspektif Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam.” El-Faqih: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Hukum Islam 5, no. 1 (April 30, 2019): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.29062/faqih.v5i1.7.
Andaryuni, Lilik. “The Program of Circuit Isbat Nikah as the Embodiment of Access to Justice in Indonesia.” Mazahib, June 30, 2018, 69–95. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v17i1.1054.
Atika, Atika, I. Ketut Seregig, and Melisa Safitri. “Analisis Hukum Acara Dalam Pelayanan Terpadu Sidang Keliling Pada Pengadilan Agama Gunung Sugih.” MAQASIDI: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 2021, 86–93. https://doi.org/10.47498/maqasidi.v1i2.650.
Baital, Bachtiar. “Urgensi Penyelenggaraan Bantuan Hukum Bagi Masyarakat Miskin Oleh Pemerintah Daerah.” SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i 3, no. 2 (May 1, 2016): 137–52. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v3i2.7854.
Fauzi, M. Latif. “Efektivitas Sidang Keliling (Studi di Pengadilan Agama Wonogori).” Al-’Adalah 14, no. 2 (2017): 367–90. https:// doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v14i2.2057.
Hasibuan, Ahmad Soleh. “Efektivitas Sidang Keliling Dalam Penerapan Asas Persidangan Cepat, Sederhana Dan Biaya Ringan (Studi Di Pengadilan Agama Padangsidimpuan).” HUKUMAH: Jurnal Hukum Islam 4, no. 1 (June 19, 2021): 1–14. https:// doi.org/10.55403/hukumah.v4i1.244.
Kamarusdiana, Kamarusdiana. “Akses Keadilan Bagi Masyarakat Kabupaten Kepulauan Seribu.” Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law 3, no. 1 (July 3, 2019): 1–24. https:// doi.org/ 10.32507/ mizan.v3i1.401.
Kusmayanti, Hazar, and Sherly Ayuna Puteri. “Dispute Settlement Practices through the Religious Court’s Mobile Court (Sidang Keliling).” FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 14, no. 3 (2020): undefined-undefined. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v14no3.1708.
Kusmayanti, Hazar, Sherly Ayuna Putri, and Linda Rahmainy. “Praktik Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Pengadilan Agama Melalui Sidang Keliling Dikaitkan Dengan Prinsip Dan Asas Hukum Acara Perdata.” ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata 4, no. 2 (2019): undefined-undefined. https:// doi.org/ 10.36913/ jhaper.v4i2.83.
Kusumawati, Mustika Prabaningrum. “Peranan Dan Kedudukan Lembaga Bantuan Hukum Sebagai Access To Justice Bagi Orang Miskin.” Arena Hukum 9, no. 2 (November 7, 2016): 190–206. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2016.00902.3.
Mahdi, Iman. “Pemberian Bantuan Hukum Terhadap Masyarakat Miskin (Studi Pada Lkbh Iain Bengkulu).” Manhaj: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat 7, no. 1 (September 26, 2019): 51–69. https://doi.org/10.29300/mjppm.v3i1.2343.
Many, Nirmala, and Ahmad Sofian. “Bantuan Hukum Cuma-Cuma (Pro Bono) Sebagai Perwujudan Akses Keadilan Bagi Masyarakat Miskin Di Indonesia.” Media Informasi Penelitian Kesejahteraan Sosial 44, no. 3 (2020). https:// doi.org/ 10.31105/ mipks.v44i3.2308.
Mekka, Marzuki, Imran Ismail, and Sitti Aminah. “Efektivitas Sidang Keliling Dalam Penerapan Asas Sederhana, Cepat Dan Biaya Ringan Di Pengadilan Agama Sengkang.” Jurnal Ada Na Gau: Public Administration 2, no. 1 (June 30, 2021): 323–30. https:// www.ojs.univprima.ac.id/index.php/ jangpa/ article/ view/148.
Mursyid, Mursyid, Muhammad Hasan, and Nur Hakimah. “Efektivitas Sidang Keliling Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Cerai Gugat Di Pengadilan Agama Sungai Raya.” Al-Usroh 3, no. 1 (June 26, 2023): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.24260/al-usroh.v3i1.919.
Noferi, Hendri. “Efektifitas Sidang Keliling Dalam Meningkatkan Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat; Studi Kasus Sidang Keliling Pengadilan Agama Muara Labuh Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian.” Jurnal AL-AHKAM 10, no. 2 (2019): 103–21. https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/2cb60cbb-f2c7-35d8-93f1-d4b3fb70dd38/.
Nuraeni, Eneng, and Dewi Mayaningsih. “Implikasi Sidang Keliling Pengadilan Agama Ciamis Terhadap Peningkatan Kesadaran Penyelesaian Perkara.” Varia Hukum 1, no. 1 (October 16, 2019): 21–44. https://doi.org/10.15575/vh.v1i1.5136.
Raharjo, Agus, A. Angkasa, and Rahadi Wasi Bintoro. “Akses Keadilan Bagi Rakyat Miskin (Dilema Dalam Pemberian Bantuan Hukum Oleh Advokat).” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 27, no. 3 (February 10, 2016): 432–44. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.15881.
Safira, Salma Siti, and Shindu Irwansyah. “Implementasi Sidang Keliling Di Pengadilan Agama Garut Menurut Maslahah Mursalah.” Jurnal Riset Hukum Keluarga Islam, July 11, 2022, 27–32. https://doi.org/10.29313/ jrhki.vi.717.
Suciati, Suciati, and Ariningsih Ariningsih. “Pengembangan Model Pendidikan Menengah Sekolah Kebangsaan Di Daerah Terpencil, Tertinggal, Terluar Dan Perbatasan Sebagai Implementasi Pembelajaran PKn.” Jurnal Moral Kemasyarakatan 1, no. 1 (June 16, 2016): 76–85. https://doi.org/10.21067/jmk.v1i1.1188.
Susanto, Yoghi Arief, Dede Kania, and Burhanuddin Burhanuddin. “Bantuan Hukum Bagi Masyarakat Miskin Di Pengadilan Agama Cimahi Tahun 2016.” Asy-Syari’ah 20, no. 2 (December 21, 2018): 175–90. https://doi.org/10.15575/as.v20i2.3079.
Tri Aji Pamungkas, Imam Mahdi, Toha Andhika. “Kepastian Hukum Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Melalui Sidang Keliling Pengadilan Agama Arga Makmur Dalam Yurisdiksi Kabupaten Mukomuko.” Accessed July 3, 2024. https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/1662006.
Ulhani, Syifa, and Saifunnajar Saifunnajar. “Efektivitas Sidang Keliling Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Di Pengadilan Agama Bengkalis (Analisis Pelayanan Sidang Keliling Tahun 2021).” Bertuah Jurnal Syariah Dan Ekonomi Islam 3, no. 2 (October 17, 2022): 156–71. https://doi.org/10.56633/jsie.v3i2.400.
Wawan, Wawan, Dadan Kurniansyah, and Kariena Febriantin. “Efektivitas program karawang cerdas dalam meningkatkan sumberdaya manusia di kabupaten karawang.” Kinerja : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen 18, no. 2 (May 28, 2021): 192–200. https://doi.org/10.30872/jkin.v18i2.9486.
Google Docs. “LAPTAH 2022.Pdf.” Accessed July 1, 2023. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fshiJ1gIGBMw6nHLGBZHWfz0OGGJWbXD/view?usp=share_link&usp=embed_facebook.
“Kegiatan Verifikasi Sidang Keliling di Kecamatan Sebulu Mendapat Animo Besar Dari Masyarakat (31/10/2022).” Accessed October 8, 2023. https://pa-tenggarong.go.id/kegiatan-peradilan/1489-verifikasi-sidang-keliling-sebulu-pengadilan-agama-tenggarong-31-10-2022.
“Radius Biaya Panggilan.” Accessed June 6, 2023. http://www.pa-tenggarong.go.id/layanan-hukum/radius-biaya-panggilan.
“Sidang Keliling dan Verifikasi Perkara di Balai Sidang Kecamatan Kota Bangun (26/08/2022).” Accessed October 8, 2023. http://www.pa-tenggarong.go.id/kegiatan-peradilan/1357-sidang-keliling-pengadilan-agama-tenggarong-26-08-2022.
SEMA No. 10/ 2010 tentang Pedoman Pemberian Bantuan Hukum.
PERMA No.1 Tahun 2014 Tentang Pedoman Pemberian Layanan Hukum Bagi Masyarakat Tidak Mampu di Pengadilan.
PERMA No. 1/ 2015 Tentang Pelayanan Terpadu Sidang Keliling di Pemgadilan Negeri dan Pengadilan Agama.
Wawancara dengan Hakim PA Tenggarong.
Wawancara dengan Hakim PA Sangata.
Wawancara dengan Panitera PA Tenggarong.
Wawancara dengan Panitera PA Sangata.
