Pragmatic Inclusion as Maintenance Agency: How Indonesian Elementary Teachers Sustain Inclusive Education without Special Education Teachers

Authors

  • Sarbini Sarbini Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati
  • Fitri Nurlatifah Azzahra Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v26i1.12064

Keywords:

elementary school, pedagogical bricolage, pragmatic inclusion, teacher agency

Abstract

Various challenges encountered in implementing inclusive education policies in Indonesia stem from a mismatch between the policies and available resources. This study seeks to explain how classroom teachers negotiate inclusive education in resource-constrained Indonesian elementary schools by examining their diagnostic practices, adaptive pedagogical strategies, and enactment of maintenance agency in the absence of special education teachers at the Garut Integrated Islamic Elementary School. The research method used in this study is a qualitative case study to capture the complex dynamics. For data collection, the researchers used in-depth interviews, observations, and reviewed some documents such as lesson plans and student assignments. The researchers selected three classroom teachers as participants for the sample. Each teacher had five years of experience in an inclusive school, although without formal training in special education. The data were systematically processed using NVivo 12, followed by data analysis, from data condensation, display, to conclusions. The findings show that inclusive education is sustained through maintenance agency, as teachers employ pragmatic adaptations to preserve learning under systemic constraints. This study introduces maintenance agency as a contextually grounded perspective on teacher agency and underscores the importance of strengthening institutional support for sustainable, inclusive education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ainscow, M. (2020). Promoting inclusion and equity in education: Lessons from international experience. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1729587

Alfredo, R., Echeverría, V., Jin, Y., Yan, L., Swiecki, Z., Gasevic, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2024). Human-centered learning analytics and AI in education: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100215

Campbell, L. (2019). Pedagogical bricolage and teacher agency: Towards a culture of creative professionalism. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 51(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1425992

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

de Certeau, M. (1988). The practice of everyday life. University of California Press.

Edwards, A. (2005). Relational agency: Learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2006.06.010

Farhana Rodhiyah, Munawwaroh, A. A., Pratiwi, V. N. Y., Hanif, A., Asrinsyirah, T. A., & Khotimah, H. (2025). Teacher Burnout Prevention Strategies in Indonesia Through Wellbeing Pedagogy Based on Islamic Educational Values. Edudeena: Journal of Islamic Religious Education, 9(2), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.30762/edudeena.v9i2.7710

Gusteti, M. U., & Neviyarni, N. (2022). Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Pada Pembelajaran Matematika Di Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Lebesgue: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Matematika Dan Statistika, 3(3), 636–646. https://doi.org/10.46306/lb.v3i3.180

Hascher, T., & Waber, J. (2021). Teacher Well-Being: A Systematic Review of the Research Literature from the Year 2000-2019. Educational Research Review, 34, 100411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100411

Hutapea, K., & Marmoah, S. (2025). Menuju SDG 4: Faktor Penghambat Implementasi Pendidikan Inklusif di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 9(6), 1856–1867. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v9i6.10752

Kamenopoulou, L., & Karisa, A. (2023). Editorial: Inclusive education in the Global South: can we turn promises into actions? Inclusive education: the era of international promises? 2023 OPEN ACCESS, 10(1), 2181–2188.

Kurniawati, F. (2021). Exploring teachers’ inclusive education strategies in rural Indonesian primary schools. Educational Research, 63(2), 198–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2021.1915698

Kurniawati, F., de Boer, A. A., Minnaert, A. E. M. G., & Mangunsong, F. (2017). Evaluating the effect of a teacher training program on the primary teachers’ attitudes, knowledge and teaching strategies regarding special educational needs. Educational Psychology, 37(3), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1176125

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Lipsky, M. (2010). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Service. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services, 76, 1–275. https://doi.org/10.2307/1960475

Messiou, K. (2021). Inclusive Inquiry: An Innovative Approach for Promoting Inclusion in Schools. Revista Latinoamericana de Educacion Inclusiva, 15(2), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-73782021000200023

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mumpuniarti, M., Handoyo, R. R., Phytanza, D. T., & Barotuttaqiyah, D. (2020). Teacher’s Pedagogy Competence and Challenges in Implementing Inclusive Learning in Slow Learners. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(1), 217–229. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i1.28807

Ok, M. W., Kim, M. K., Kang, E. Y., & Bryant, B. R. (2016). How to Find Good Apps: An Evaluation Rubric for Instructional Apps for Teaching Students With Learning Disabilities. Intervention in School and Clinic, 51(4), 244–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451215589179

Pantic, N., & Florian, L. (2015). Developing teachers as agents of inclusion and social justice. Education Inquiry, 6(3), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v6.27311

Pressley, T. (2021). Factors contributing to teacher burnout during COVID-19. Educational Researcher, 50(5), 325–327. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211004138

Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2026). Teacher Agency: An Ecological Approach. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350536371

Putri Herlambang, A., Matulessy, A., & Sahaja Dewi, Y. (2026). Kesejahteraan psikologis guru pendidikan khusus di lingkungan sekolah inklusif: Studi kasus SLB Negeri Surakarta. Paedagogy: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Psikologi, 6(2), 1451–1463. https://doi.org/10.51878/paedagogy.v6i2.10386

Rahayu, R., Rosita, R., Rahayuningsih, Y. S., Hernawan, A. H., & Prihantini, P. (2022). Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar di Sekolah Penggerak. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 6313–6319. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3237

Ridwan, M. F., & Nadirah, Y. F. (2024). Manajemen kelas inklusif: kolaborasi guru kelas dan guru pembimbing khusus. Irsyad. Jurnal Bimbingan, Penyuluhan, Konseling, Dan Psikoterapi Islam, 12(1), 1–15. https://jurnal.uinsyahada.ac.id/index.php/Irsyad/article/view/18505

Singal, N. (2019). Challenges and opportunities in efforts towards inclusive education: Reflections from India. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(7–8), 827–840. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1624845

Slee, R. (2018). Defining the Scope of Inclusive Education. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265773. Accessed on May 7th, 2026

Tarnoto, N. (2020). Permasalahan yang Dihadapi Sekolah Penyelenggara Pendidikan Inklusi pada Tingkat SD. Humanitas: Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, 13(1), 50–61. https://doi.org/10.26555/humanitas.v13i1.3843

Tracy, S. J. (2020). Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Designing Analysis, Communicating Impact (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

UNESCO. (2020). Laporan Pemantauan Pendidikan Global 2020: Inklusi dan pendidikan: Semua berarti semua. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54676/JJNK6989

UNESCO. (2024). Global education monitoring report, 2024/5, Leadership in education: lead for learning. UNESCO Digital Library. https://doi.org/10.54676/EFLH5184

United Nations. (2024). Leave No One Behind: Strengthening Inclusive Education Systems Globally. United Nations Publications.

Van Mieghem, A., Verschueren, K., Petry, K., & Struyf, E. (2020). An analysis of research on inclusive education: a systematic search and meta review. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(6), 675–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1482012

Wadria, K. N. I., Damri, D., & Zulpiani, M. (2025). Peran guru pendamping khusus dalam mewujudkan kelas inklusif yang efektif. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan Dan Biologi, 2(4), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.61132/jucapenbi.v2i4.832

Wenger-Trayner, E., & Wenger-Trayner, B. (2022). Learning to Make a Difference: Value Creation in Social Learning Systems. Cambridge University Press.

Woodcock, S., Sharma, U., Subban, P., & Hitches, E. (2022). Teacher self-efficacy and inclusive education practices: Rethinking teachers’ engagement with inclusive practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 117, 103802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103802

Downloads

Published

2026-06-15

How to Cite

Pragmatic Inclusion as Maintenance Agency: How Indonesian Elementary Teachers Sustain Inclusive Education without Special Education Teachers. (2026). Dinamika Ilmu, 26(1), 69-85. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v26i1.12064