Caught between Risks and Pleasures: Children’s Digital User Profiles, Their Right-Based Experiences and Self-Rights Awareness in Digital Media Areas in the Light of Multicultural Children’s Human Rights Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v26i1.13513Keywords:
multicultural children’s rights-education, Children’s digital environments, children’s rights, user tendenciesAbstract
This study investigates the digital user profiles of children, rights-based experiences, and their awareness of digital rights within the framework of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child’s General Comment No 25. Highlighting the paradoxical position of children as a unique yet underappreciated user group, the research also explores how digital environments impact their well-being and best interests, and why children’s human rights education, suitable for multiculturalism, is important in the digital age. The research data were collected from 1430 children's open-ended questionnaires and one-on-one interviews. The findings reveal that children primarily access digital platforms through tablets and phones, spending one-third of their daytime hours on gaming, entertainment, and social interaction. Emotionally, these experiences oscillate between intense pleasure and anger. While children demonstrate a protective stance toward personal data and recognize the benefits of digital tools for education, communication, and freedom of expression, they face significant risks regarding exposure to violent, sexual, and commercial content. Crucially, the current study identifies a gap in children’s awareness of their digital rights, with many reporting frequent violations through cyberbullying and harassment. The results indicate a disconnect between children's digital user tendencies and their rights awareness, underscoring an urgent need to integrate digital literacy and children’s rights education in digital areas, grounded in intercultural sensitivity, to better protect their interests in an increasingly digitized society.
Downloads
References
Berg, B. L. (1998). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences. (Third Edition). Allyn & Bacon.
Byrne, B., & Lundy, L. (2019). Children's rights-based childhood policy: A six-P framework. The International Journal of Human Rights, 23(3), 357–373 https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2018.1558977
Cino, D., Lacko, D., Mascheroni, G. & Šmahel, G. (2023). Predictors of children’s and young people’s digital engagement in informational, communication, and entertainment activities: Findings from ten European countries. Journal of Children and Media, 17(1), 37-54, https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2022.2123013
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164460020001049
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE Publications
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th Edition, SAGE Publications, Inc., London.
de Leeuw, R. N. H., & Buijzen, M. (2016). Introducing positive media psychology to the field of children, adolescents, and media. Journal of Children and Media, 10(1), 39-46, https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2015.1121892
Day, E., Pothong, K., Atabey, A., & Livingstone, S. (2022). Who controls children’s education data? A socio-legal analysis of the UK governance regimes for schools and EdTech. Learning, Media and Technology, https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2152838
Dienlin, T., & Johannes, N. (2020). The impact of digital technology use on adolescent well-being. Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience, 22(2), 135–142. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2020.22.2/tdienlin
Hareket, E., & Yel, S. (2017). Which perceptions do we have related to our rights as child? Child rights from the perspective of primary school students. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n3p340
Hareket, E., & Kartal, A. (2021). An overview of research on children’s rights in primary school: A meta-synthesis. Children and Youth Services Review, 131, 106286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106286
Hareket, E., & Kartal, A. (2024). Are children and youth “right” in animated movies?: A systematic analysis. The International Journal of Children's Rights, 32(2), 288–326. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-32020001
Hareket, E. (2025). Looking at past experiences through the lens of children’s rights: Reflections from prospective teachers’ childhood memories. The International Journal of Children's Rights, 33(4), 986–1043. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-33040008
Gillett?Swan, J. K., & Sargeant, J. (2018). Voice-inclusive practice, digital literacy, and children's participatory rights. Children & Society, 32(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/chso.12230
Kostyrka?Allchorne, K., Stoilova, M., Bourgaize, J., Rahali, M., Livingstone, S., & Sonuga?Barke, E. (2023). Digital experiences and their impact on the lives of adolescents with pre?existing anxiety, depression, eating, and nonsuicidal self?injury conditions–a systematic review. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 28(1), https://doi.org/22-32. 10.1111/camh.12619
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.
Livingstone, S. (2021). Realizing children’s rights in relation to the digital environment. European Review, 29(1), 20-33. https://doi.org/10.1017/S106279872000054X
Livingstone, S., & Bulger, M. (2014). A global research agenda for children's rights in the digital age. Journal of Children and Media, 8(4), 317-335, https://doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2014.961496
Livingstone, S. (2015). What difference does ‘the digital’make to children’s experiences of risk? International Journal of Public Health, 60(2), 127-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00038-015-0661-3
Livingstone, S., Kirwil, L., Ponte, C., & Staksrud, E. (2014). In their own words: What bothers children online? European Journal of Communication, 29(3), 271-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323114521045
Livingstone, S., & Görzig, A. (2014). When adolescents receive sexual messages on the internet: Explaining experiences of risk and harm. Computers in Human Behavior, 33, 8-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.12.021
Martinez-Sainz, G., & Hanna, A. (2023). Youth digital activism, social media, and human rights education: the Fridays for Future movement. Human Rights Education Review, 6(1), 116-136, https://doi.org/10.7577/hrer.4958
Njagi, J. (2023). Analysis of the constructions of children and the internet in Kenya and Ghana. Journal of Children and Media, 17(1), 55-74, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17482798.2022.2125994
Öhman, M., & Quennerstedt, A. (2017). Questioning the no-touch discourse in physical education from a children's rights perspective. Sport, Education and Society, 22(3), 305-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2015.1030384
Reid Chassiakos, Y., Radesky, J., Christakis, D., Moreno, M. A., Cross, C., & Council on Communications and Media. (2016). Children and adolescents and digital media. Pediatrics, 138(5), https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2025-07532
Rice, E. S., Haynes, E., Royce, P., & Thompson, S. C. (2016). Social media and digital technology use among Indigenous young people in Australia: A literature review. International Journal for Equity In Health, 15(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0366-0
Stoilova, M., Livingstone, S., & Nandagiri, R. (2020). Digital by default: Children's capacity to understand and manage online data and privacy. Media and Communication, 8(4), 197-207. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i4.3407
Van Der Hof, S., Lievens, E., Milkaite, I., Verdoodt, V., Hannema, T., & Liefaard, T. (2020). The child’s right to protection against economic exploitation in the digital world. The International Journal of Children's Rights, 28(4), 833-859. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-28040003
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work
